Wirral Council Pants On Fire.

You may recall this case HERE with regard to the delay in care packages by Wirral Social Services ?  You may note that Howard Copper interim Director of DASS stated “We strongly dispute the allegation that care packages have been, and continue to be delayed;- [NB. The reference to “continue to be delayed ” actually wasn’t part of the allegation and is more obfuscation on WBC’s part]. He finishes with a pithy –  “Allegations around saving money are conjecture.”

It should be further noted that WBC took legal advice on this matter, but not to risk assess the impact of an illegal 4 week delay, because of course they claim it didn’t happen and it was illegal and they would never do such a thing and of course the whistle-blower must be “a bit mad” … the advice was from Weightmans Solicitors (whose Local Government associate also worked for Wirral Council between 1998 and 2003)

It is also noted that in the advice provided by Weightmans to the council they stated

If the reason was to save money, then clearly it would be unlawful and the Council would be heavily criticised” It then goes on to state that there is no evidence of this and that Richard O’Brien’s (Head Of Assessment) explanation is entirely reasonable.

However below are  minutes of an Access & Assessment BUDGET meeting to discuss savings. It states unequivocally that Richard O’Brien and Senior managers agreed to implement a 4 week delay in commissioning care from the independent sector. Something they have persistently denied.  It would also appear that the legal advice taken was not as part of a through enquiry into the whistleblowers concerns, but rather a misuse of public money to cover their own voluminous  arse!

 Here are the minutes of the BUDGET meeting.








Rick O’Brien              Head of Service Access & Assessment (Chair)

Breda Dutton                     Principal Manager Homecare

Anne Bailey                        Principal Manager Homecare Re-ablement

Pete Gosling                      Principal Manager Older People

Phil Gilroy                          Principal Manager Specialist Services

Dave Carroll                          Service Manager OT

Chris Taylor                           Service Manager MH

Sheila Finnigan-Jones            Service Manager LD

Steve Passey              Service Manager OP

Ruth Page                         (Minutes) Secretary




Paula Neate                           Reform Unit Manager

Trish Iddon                             Brokerage


Note: Not for wider circulation until further notice.

RO’B outlined the aims of the meeting which were to identify additional proposals to manage increasing costs of community care budget.  2 critical areas were Domiciliary Care and Learning Disabilities.

Following discussion the following actions were agreed:


  • RO’B to agree LD Panels outcomes
  • Further discussion to take place re funding with Children and Young People’s Department.
  • Increase LD Review Team resources by 2 staff

Domiciliary Care

·        Authorisation by Service Manager for all spending

·        4 week delay in commissioning care from independent sector

·        Hospital Discharge to be priority

·        Residential respite Care from independent sector– stopped

·        Unscheduled reviews – agreement for time limited period then referral to HART – no long-term commitment

·        Additional Team Manager to be assigned to check re-start packages – PN to look at activity.

·        Focus on delays re complaint involving high-cost packages – RO’b to hear appeals.

·        Respite Care suspended – SP to authorise any exceptions

·        Increase Review Team resources by 3 staff

·        Mark Jones to gate-keep and authorise decisions from Access/Review Teams

·        Steve Passey to gate-keep and authorise decisions from Long-Term Teams

·        Dave Carroll to gate-keep and authorise decisions from Hospital Team

·        Set £320 pw limit on care packages provide residential care as alternative.  TI to identify high cost packages.  PN to look at ILF funding issues.

·        Time reduction for double handling calls/hoisting – PN to investigate insurance issues raised by independent providers

·        Meal provision – RO’B to write to providers re request for information – 24 hours to respond or suspension of account.  Extra Admin resources to handle response.  TI to draft letter.

·        Track reduction in spend on a weekly basis.

·        Provide information of numbers of Dementia cases for PCT funding.

RO’B to extend request for savings initiatives to all staff.


And so DASS Senior management DID agree to implement a policy which that effects vulnerable adults but of course they would have conducted a robust risk and impact assessment before putting this into practice. Erm apparently not

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s