Peer Less

Peer review

Let’s make a declaration of interest from the outset  – we fundamentally object to peer reviews. Local government gurus glad handing  their well-paid peers and telling them that they feel their pain (for a fat fee  minus VAT) .

No thank you.

What we need is someone who has never worked in local government and preferably never had to climb that greasy pole like a pole dancer in a pin stripe suit.

No doubt their report would be somewhat more succinct and read :  ” WTAF!”.

So imagine our cynicism when we learned that the report about the latest Wirral Council peer review co-ordinated by the Local Government Association (LGA) had been not so much released as escaped  under the banner : Council Improvement Continues ( no laughing at the back).

We suspect even the Liverpool Echo weren’t buying that bogus headline.

The review  was led by Mark Rogers, Chief Executive of Birmingham City Council. The same council who have hit the headlines because their plans to cut care for disabled was ruled unlawful and is the leading case when it comes to cuts in social care.

Mr.Rogers tells us :

It is important to stress that this was not an inspection. Peer challenges are improvement orientated and tailored to meet individual council’s needs. You asked the peer team to explore:  The council’s capacity to deliver the Wirral Plan 2020  The council’s approach to partnership working  New models for service delivery

So basically Wirral Council controlled the show . But the cracks are there. So let’s a shine a light on them because that’s what we do best.

First of all –   BS bingo fans will be reassured that besides the obligatory pie chart there are the following  favourites:

Interdependencies ✓

Integrated commissioning hub ✓

Transformation agenda ✓

Pledge driven ✓

Personality proof ✓

Holistic ✓

Joined up conversations ✓

We particularly liked that reclusive  Chief Executive  Eric “Feeble” Robinson is described as ‘a breath of fresh air’  as this is basically a bit of bitch-slap for his predecessor Graham Burgess.We liked that. We liked that a lot.

Furthermore we liked the following sly dig :

However, the Senior Leadership Team is not currently giving adequate corporate leadership and this needs to be much stronger if the Plan is to be delivered effectively

Which may explain why Super Duper Directors Clare Fish and Joe Blott are on the way out. Initially we had a degree of sympathy for these two – way out of their depth and caught up in other people’s corruption and then we remembered their six figure salaries and all sympathy evaporated.

They also do a fine line in stating the bleedin’ obvious :

The peer team also had a concern at the current high use of consultants and interims

You don’t say !.

Meanwhile the naivete is staggering :

The delivery of the Wirral Plan and pledges and the role of scrutiny may be enhanced in the longer term by offering opposition members a leadership role on the Policy & Performance Committees.

Scrutiny ?. By opposition members?. Can we have some of what the LGA are on?.

However this was our favourite observation:

The council and its partner agencies recognise that they want to form a different relationship with residents in the future. There is general recognition that relationships with local communities has been negatively impacted by the past challenges the council has had to deal with. The new relationship will be based on a clearer Wirral narrative, a greater ability to listen to resident’s issues, making better use of the data and intelligence the council gathers across the Wirral and greater use of channels use as digital and social media. 

Somebody from the LGA needs to tell Wirral Council  that they simply need to follow Wirral Leaks……but then they already do that !. But unfortunately it is a “new relationship” over which they have no control…….and we all know how they love to be in control!. Therefore we predict that this is one relationship that will continue to be fraught!.


7 thoughts on “Peer Less

  1. G’day Leaky

    This lot make me physically sick.

    The Grant Thornton £50,000.00 plus independent investigation into BIG, ISUS and Working Neighbourhoods for example.

    It is their own effing auditors that they run rings around, I know I worked for their predecessor, The Audit Commission, so tell me My Leaky what is independent about them?

    Then to tell them not to interview council staff.

    It has to be stopped L.



    For they’re a pack of scum bags

    For they’re a pack of scum bags

    For the………………..


  2. G’day Lordly

    I would like to start a new campaign you being the first to know of it.



    They just don’t care Lordsville about the less fortunate and nod and ear ear for their own miserable low life wannabe someone existences without using a single brain cell of their own.

    Their poor families, possibly not they might have all the same genes, living with what can only be described as a


    a person who has an obsessive desire for power.
    a person who suffers delusions of their own power or importance.

    (One in particular even thinks they had an art gallery after them.)

    Thanks Lordsville the reason being that they just don’t care about people less fortunate.

    or in my words

    They are horrible, vile, crass, vulgar not even HUMAN beings.



    That is what I think of the rank and file Leaky you should see what I think of “The Phil the Dills” “Ecca the Blinking CEO” “The Shyster” “Legweak” “Ankles” “The Pretend Friend” et al the so called power house that to me resembles a SH….better not say that……. a DUNNY.

    So L will luv ya more if you help with my campaign, if that is possible, and get some decent people elected. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

  3. Wirral stopped connecting with its communities when Emma Degg come in and took total control of any sort of communication and honest dialogue. It even got to the point where Jim Wilkie was accompanied by Ms Degg to any community meeting he attended and even managed the questions he was asked. Before then Wirral Council had officers from each department that worked closely with local organisations and groups to help solve issues affecting them before they escalated. Officers then became micro-managed by Degg and she brought in her own people. When the Constituency Committees where set up, Degg made sure all her “preferred candidates” got the CC Managers posts even though the majority of them had no experience of working directly with communities. No wonder there is no trust.

    • G’day Ste

      Its not news to me Ste the **** has always been mightier than the sword.

      Gra Gra is dead long live Ecca.

      Until he gets a new job soon.





Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s