Data Protection


As we know Public Health England have been called in to look into goings on at drug and alcohol support service Change,Grow, Live (CGL) after worrying death statistics and allegations of concerning work practices were published on Wirral Leaks.

CGL are funded to the tune of £7.7 million per annum from public health monies which are now frighteningly administered by Wirral Council. So we were a little surprised that Wirral Council had eventually called in Public Health England , as it seemed they were adopting the same approach as they did with Children’s Services highlighted in the recent Ofsted report. Another case of officers and councillors knowing there were serious issues but going into denial and doing nothing to address concerns.

However we soon began to have doubts as to whether Public Health England were the right body to undertake this investigation. These doubts have intensified after further investigation by ourselves and information provided by sources who share our concerns.

First of all let us introduce you to the National Drug Treatment Monitoring System (NDTMS)

Providers such as CGL uses and uploads all their data on to the NDTMS. It has been suggested to us that if CGL stopped using it it would threaten the very existence of the drug and alcohol unit at Public Health England.Their only source of intelligence comes via NDTMS, without it they couldn’t function and they rely on the good will of providers to send them the information. CGL have developed their own version of NDTMS via notepads and mobile devices so keyworkers can work out in the community and input data and then input this data again for NDTMS.

Now this is where it has been suggested to us that things gets interesting : Public Health England may not want to be too hard on CGL as they know they could stop uploading data to the NDTMS and because they are a leading player there would be a huge void in the data received, therefore PHE wouldn’t be able to report to Government or post their endless bits of self -justifying evidence. Could this be a case of data providing protection for CGL?!.
Therefore we would suggest that to avoid any suggestion of compromise a third party needs to investigate CGL alongside Public Health England . It’s been suggested to us that Release would be ideal for the role
We also wonder whether investigators will have the power/remit to ask questions as to whether CGL consultants are paid via an offshore account. This allegation has recently been brought to our attention. If true then this would mean CGL consultants only pay tax at 10% compared to 40% in the UK. This would surely place CGL at a competitive advantage when it came to tendering for services and if confirmed there is a possibility that they could be breaking competition law.
We’re sure that CGL would be willing in the interests of openness and transparency reassure investigators that this and other allegations made about their practices are completely unfounded.

4 thoughts on “Data Protection

  1. Excellent to see this information, as a service user I was concerned to hear that CGL (ex Crime Reduction Initiatives) do not have access to their own patients’ médical notes. This is because they would have to buy computers and train people to use them in order for CGL to access the NHS data. Not surprisingly the NHS isn’t too keen on just chucking patient data out to some care company? Which brings me to another point. Shouldn’t that “third party” investigating the state of appalling death rates among patients under their care be the Care Quality Commission ?
    Francis Cook

  2. Simple Definition of charity

    : the act of giving money, food, or other kinds of help to people who are poor, sick, etc.; also : something (such as money or food) that is given to people who are poor, sick, etc.

    : an organization that helps people who are poor, sick, etc.

    : the organizations that help people in need

    charity : as defined above in its most simple and non intellectual terms – I would use the above definition to draw attention to the following piece of reported information.

    It would appear that Change, Grow, Live or ( Die ) (if your living on the Wirral) – have a somewhat bastardized view and a fast and loose idea about the interpretation of the meaning of charity. A worry for an institution selling itself as a charity – and sell itself it does. The more paternalistic reader may feel that the reported actions are a wise and prudent course of action – the more astute and realistic may be inclined to think that CGL’s actions may well be bordering on the illegal by withholding from any individual that which, is, in the eyes of the law, his or hers.

    Of course, if it was felt that a given individual lacked the capacity to manage their affairs in a manner that could lead to harm upon themselves – I would draw to your attention the fact this country has a very precise, legal and accountable framework of psychiatric and mental health laws in place to accommodate those concerns. But, there is not a lot of fiscal interest available down that route.

    Its all enough to give you an unhealthy dose of the – i’m – doing – it -all – for – charidy – blues.

    I’m going back to desolation row where it all makes sense.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s