Election Selection : Week 6

xmas-frank

Understandably, considering this week’s atrocities in Manchester , politics and the general election in particular has been put firmly in its place. That place being a self-serving sideshow – most usually played out in the gutter.

Et Tu, Frankie?

Talking of which we note this week that Birkenhead MP Frank Field took some time out from writing for his usual safe havens  ( The S*n, The Daily Mail) to get a letter printed on enemy territory in The Grauniad  (aka The Guardian).

https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2017/may/21/how-might-labour-get-a-fair-hearing-for-its-popular-policies

Note how Frankenfield stabs the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn  , ever so politely, in the back:

‘In the event of a defeat on 8 June, Jeremy’s manifesto must be the point from which a new PLP alone chooses a parliamentary leader who is able to build trust and legitimacy with the electorate. For the new parliamentary leader not to start from here, and to revert to Blairism, would miss the point of just how much Jeremy has changed centre-left politics. The test which must be passed in the new parliament is to combine a popular programme with a leader who possesses prime ministerial qualities.’

So basically, having apparently already conceded defeat , the bitter and twisted poverty tourist says he likes Jezza’s policies but he thinks his main failing is that he lacks the gravitas of his late heroine, Margaret Thatcher . With the narrowing gap in the opinion polls we’re left wondering whether Frankenfield has made a very rare political mis-step or is he just being spectacularly disloyal and duplicitous as usual?

Manifesto Fun

Quite rightly ,one of last week’s commentators took us to task about  whether we’d actually read each political parties manifestos for the forthcoming general election. To which we could only reply – ain’t nobody got time for that!

So following on from our commentary about the Resolution Foundation’s analysis of the manifestos of the two major political parties and the similarity between their welfare policies we move on to expert opinion on the manifesto pledges dealing with finance and crime ( is there a difference we hear you cry !).

Financial think tank, the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) , tells us that neither the Conservative or Labour Party party’s general election manifestos sets out an honest set of choices :

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/may/26/conservative-labour-tax-spending-plans-ifs-general-election-manifesto

And so it would appear that you pays your money and you’re stuffed either way you vote!

Meanwhile the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies published their assessment of the key manifesto pledges by the Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats.

With the appalling events which took place in Manchester this week their analysis takes on greater significance. Interestingly they reject the notion that , given the lack of strong evidence that more police cut crime, a policy to increase police numbers is not desirable. This points to a broader challenge, as Will McMahon argues in a comment piece on the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies website in May 2017

https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/UKJPR%20Focus%2C%20Assessing%20the%20Manifestos%2C%20May%202017.pdf

 The resourcing of mental health workers and social workers to manage demand presently met by police officers should be a high priority. This would necessarily mean an overall shift in government budgets away from policing and towards the training and employment of social work and mental health professionals. This approach could lead to a radically downsized and less publicly visible police force, shorn of its social work responsibilities and instead, focusing on the estimated 16 per cent of incoming calls to command and control centres that are actually about law-breaking.

As we’ve said before – the information is out there to make your electoral choice. All we ask is that you make it an informed one!

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Election Selection : Week 6

  1. It’s practically two years since Bobby47 posted this heartfelt message, yet here we are, still spiralling down, down, down. We can only assume they didn’t read it or if they did, they had a good laugh at it, or assumed it didn’t refer to them, the inhuman swine.

    “Isn’t it an odd society that’s been created?

    Endless tiers of responsibility are set up and presented to us all so that the weak and the vulnerable can be protected and protocols are put in place to safeguard these much cherished noble ideals and when you simply pop the question, ‘why has this been done and why aren’t you doing anything about it’, you immediately get shoved in the out tray, the too difficult basket and get quickly branded a Troll or worse, a vexatious individual.

    Call me a fool with a keyboard but it is an extremely odd way to behave. What’s so very wrong in responding, ‘I honestly didn’t know, if what you say is right then something has gone badly wrong and if you’ll be patient with me I’ll have a look into this and get bloody back to you’.

    Course, it doesn’t bloody happen does it! Every single one of them dives for cover, covers their ears muttering, ‘I didn’t hear that’ and round and bloody round we go, constantly trying to dress up our language in the hope that just one if them will have a nibble, take an interest and bloody do something about it.

    Obsessed with themselves, desperately steering clear of anything resembling a steaming cow pat, they duck, dive, call you names and paint a picture that it’s you who’s the problem rather than the original rotten sin that got you going in the first bloody place.

    It’s truly desperately depressing that ‘they’ have evolved in this strange way where reputation management is placed far and above anything else.

    God help us. We’re bloody doomed.”

  2. Poor old Frank Field gets another kicking, still why not? We all have our weaknesses…..anyway Frank here is the BOOMERANG…

    ‘We have given them almost six years to own up and say it was all wrong, they’ve lied, cheated, hidden stuff, obfuscated and told bare faced lies.’

    The Aussie, on the Wirral Biz/Council scandal.

    • and indeed interested that does precis Bobby 47’s piece above does it not?

      the whistle-blower becomes the enemy for pointing out glaring defects.

      It is an important observation for which the Aussie repeatedly points it out. It is an occassion where all the evidence has pointed to the reputation management aspect of local government..and not simply from hearsay but fully documented

  3. Jezzer has Frankie in the tent pissing out rather that outside pissing in! Keep your friends close and your enemies closer!

  4. Pingback: Election Special: Leading with the Left | Wirralleaks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s