The Twelve Days of Christmas : Day Four – Protect Money


Protect whistleblowers

One of the advantages of this time of the year is that we can catch up on stories that landed in in our tray but we never got round to because we were distracted by another story and/or we needed to do some further research.

For this story we are indebted to John Brace for having the patience to wade through Wirral Council invoices and publish the details on his website way back in August in a post titled  What has Wirral Council been spending money on in 2017 and 2018 (part 2)

The information that particularly caught our eye was the fact that Wirral Council have paid Public Concern at Work £11,250 for a whistleblowing advice line. Since the publication of these details the whistleblowing charity has since had a re-branding and changed their name to the snappier, if rather ambiguous, Protect.

Now you may be wondering as to why we took a particular interest in this payment . Surely you may think that  it would be money well spent ,even for cash-strapped Wirral Council, especially when you consider their chequered history when it has come to dealing with various high profile and damaging whistleblowing cases. Indeed Wirral Council first bunged the charity £10K + in 2012 when they involved them in re-writing their woeful whistleblowing policies and procedures. However what we take issue with is that Protect already offer a free whistleblowing advice line , so why are Wirral Council paying a premium for a dedicated advice line and how can this possibly be value for money?  It would be interesting to know how many workers have taken advantage of this advice line and what monitoring information that Protect provide to Wirral Council.

What’s more surely there are conflict of interest issues involved if Protect are supposed to be giving impartial, independent advice to Wirral Council workers who have concerns about their employer when ultimately Wirral Council are paying for that advice!

From what we’ve gathered from local whistleblowing sources Protect are not held in high regard anyway, often advising whistleblowers to leave their employment rather than risk the threat of victimisation for the heinous crime of telling the truth. Whilst this sometimes may indeed be in the workers  best interest it does nothing to address their whistleblowing concerns and ultimately it is not in the public interest to allow  employers to ignore the following disclosures that a worker reasonably believes are happening, has taken place, or is likely to happen in the future.

  • A criminal offence
  • The breach of a legal obligation
  • A miscarriage of justice
  • A danger to the health and safety of any individual
  • Damage to the environment
  • Deliberate attempt to conceal any of the above.

Which makes us wonder what’s the Protect money is for ? – to protect whuistleblowers or to protect the reputation of Wirral Council? We certainly know were we’d put our £11,250…






































what are Wirral Council trying to ‘protect’ their staff orwho is to protect

7 thoughts on “The Twelve Days of Christmas : Day Four – Protect Money

  1. They tell you to think of your health and leave .. they have access to solicitors who can ,depending on the case ,professionally help you, so very clearly that “dependence” will never be against an organisation paying them .. utter disgrace and complete waste of money.. yet another layer of protection for corrupt council officers and councillors oh and MPs .. this should be looked into as you underline total conflict of interest ..

    • God Bless You Ali and of couse you Leaky

      May “Philly “FUCKING” Liar” depart this year and never be heard of again.

      His legacy

      Kev and Stella’s Stinking Stagnant wirral Waters












      Most of the crud dross and shite of Wirral.

      What have they done between them not forgetting of course

      The rest of the sewage








      et al

      Have a great year Ali and Lordy and may they all disappear for the good of wirral.


      • Onwards into 2019 James, another year where your principle and passion will be conveniently misunderstood by those who deserve nightmares and pustules for the their part in allowing this council to become one of the worst in the UK .. May their turning heads be ripped off by a passing bin lorry ! Happy New Year James !

  2. Many years ago a Whistle blowing policy was introduced by Wirral featuring a senior manager from HR on the posters. They were removed when CQC inspected and never replaced,this was prior to the Morton incident! No the ‘new’ initiative is probably to cover the respective backsides of the many dodgy dealers in the Clowncil, This one may work as Ms Ugg isn’t involved-yet!

      • The policy included workers of subcontractors therein this affording James and I the status of whistleblowers. By 2013 this clause was removed albeit statute had referred explicitly to the generic worker.

        The judge in my case v WBC explicitly referred to worker covering myself whatever the WBC policy said. However my discovery of malpractice by WBC predated the laws amendment

        It still applies that workers include those working for subcontractors to WBC..a very important legal fact.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s