5G Whizz

The latest from our ‘5G Whizz’ – don’t say you weren’t told:

More on 5G and 5G testing in Liverpool

Liverpool and Wirral Councils, in combination with telecom companies, have been quietly rolling out the 5G infrastructure grid WITHOUT SAFETY TESTING, WITHOUT CONSULTATION, WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE and WITHOUT APPROVAL TO BE EXPERIMENTED UPON. 

As discussed in previous articles 5G is NOT an upgrade to 4G. 5G phased array, beam forming small cells will be everywhere and will forcibly expose everyone to hundreds of times the radiation levels that we have already been exposed to by 2G, 3G, 4G, GPS, WiFi and Bluetooth devises. As a reminder the ONLY safety testing that the ICNIRP guidelines expect Councils, Government and Industry to work to is if one single devise does not heat up a fluid filled dummy head by 2 degrees over a short c. 6 minute exposure. There is and never has been ANY biological safety testing on continuous exposure and to multiple frequencies and devises. Many people are already unknowingly suffering from radiation related exposure health issues such as anxiety, depression, sleeplessness, tinnitus, behavioural issues, rashes, memory loss, infertility as well as increased levels of autism, dementia and cancer to name a few. Birds and insects continue to decline unable to withstand the radiation fields. Mature trees and hedges are felled to remove signal obstacles.

Liverpool City Council has been given over £200m to roll out an unlicensed 5G network across Kensington in Liverpool.  Unlicensed meaning they will use their own network and not have to pay the telecoms company for using theirs.

Blu Wireless are providing much of the technology in the form of nodes to be attached to street lamps, street furniture, under manhole covers and on buildings. As millimetre wave technology cannot effectively pass through trees or walls they have to get around this. Trees will get felled although there aren’t many trees in Kensington so this may not be so obvious here. However, this explains the mass tree fellings taking place across Liverpool, the Wirral, the rail network and the UK. Trees are 5G obstacles…this is a FACT…and was heard directly from the horse’s mouth at a recent Council meeting. To get around concrete, the nodes will also be attached to buildings such as care homes, old people’s homes, possible schools. No permission is needed unless you own your own house. This will create a spider web of intense, inescapable wireless radiation. The council aim to equip 66,000 street lamps with the nodes effectively blanketing Liverpool and the Wirral with this lethal technology.

So, what are some of the plans for 5G in the Kensington test bed and the insane rationale for this rapidly proliferating crime against humanity and the environment?…

The Council claim that 60% of people in Kensington don’t have access to the internet and that 5G will improve health and social care….mmmm….how caring and benevolent.  This seems just as unlikely a connection as how the new ‘smart meter’ push adverts are trying to convince us that irradiating us and collecting our data will help us ‘breath clean air’.

They claim that there are lots of children in the Kensington area that cannot do their homework because they don’t have access to the internet. As the families would still need to buy access to the 5G internet data and buy a laptop, tablet or computer, it seems illogical how 5G will help as 4G would still do the trick. No such thing as a free lunch. Families and schools should be encouraged / helped to have safe hardwired (non WiFi/non mobile) access to the internet to minimise radiation exposure to their growing children and safeguard their health.  This would improve health and social care, not 5G.

Cancers take many years to develop. All children and young adults have now been exposed to wireless cell phone and WiFi radiation since in the womb and it seems no coincidence that cancer rates in the under 15’s are now around 1 in 5 with cancer rates in the population at 1 in 2. Oh well….at least the children can do their homework with a 5G node installed outside their bedroom window exposing them to hundreds of times the radiation levels we already have. Phew, our future is secure.

Meanwhile, the old and vulnerable can silently increase their risk of dementia and degenerative diseases whilst talking to their virtual wireless assistant (i.e. spying devise) warming themselves on the 5G network radiation spewing into their homes. The planned Medi Hub devices equipped with a camera are intended to save the council money on having to send carers out to check on them. The device will ring like a phone and the person will answer, someone from a central hub will watch them take their medication etc. the call will end. These soulless devices have been getting trialled out and the users are reportedly not happy as they have been told to keep everything plugged in where they would normally switch things off for safety reasons and to save money on electricity. Leaving things on totally goes against any advise you would get off an electrician or fire safety officer or to save the climate. Their energy bills will increase but don’t worry, they will no doubt have a smart meter pulsing radiation into their homes every 10 seconds monitoring their usage and movements back to a central hub. In a recent Council meeting, they only seemed concerned with how to ensure old people left every electrical wireless devise on, no mention of testing the health effects of radiation and isolation. Such an ill conceived plan will not only lead to radiation increased illness, it will also definitely lead to terrible isolation as the carer might be the only person they see which in turn will lead to a deterioration in physical and mental health costing the NHS more money. But no worries, a premature ending will save money in the end.

Medi Hub owner Paman confirmed that this technology could in fact also run off 3G and 4G.  Children should most definitely also be using hard-wired connections to minimise wireless exposure. So, just on these two counts alone, it begs the question, why are the Council so keen to roll out 5G under the guise of improving health and social care? Money and control might come into the mix along with conveniently having laid the infrastructure for other technologies and promised savings such as connected autonomous vehicles which will pierce pedestrians and cyclists bodies with c. 25 high frequency beams on each vehicle beam forming to the nearest lamppost; Transport jobs will be lost; Jobs, as well as health, will be lost in factories with AI and robotics; and cows will be tortured with 5G radiation devises around their necks as they enter automatic milking machines during their miserable farming ordeal. Some more great cost savings there. But hey, you can download an HD video in under one second with 5G and sit on the couch waiting for your fast food drone delivery, so all good.

The fact is 5G will involve a massive increase in forced radiation exposure to children (who will be encouraged to spend even more time in front of their addictive tablet devises) and old vulnerable people (who will have their care workers removed and replaced with spying camera devises). Oh, we nearly forgot…”as rising rates of stress and burnout for healthcare professionals coincide with increased demand for personalised patient care, 5G technology provides a solution that takes the pressure off all parties”, according to the manufactures. What an improvement for health and social care, a total success for the test bed!!!  Every living creature will be unable to escape the radiation web….certainly the ICNIRP has never performed a safety test on insects, birds, plants, bacteria, let alone a living human cell.

The council have perhaps been paid a lot of money and promised a lot of savings to roll this out. Perhaps they have just been misled. Perhaps they haven’t thought twice about the health side of it or conducted even the most basic research other than blindly believing the ICNIRP safety mantra. Perhaps they actually really believe the blatant lies that irradiating every living creature with this technology will help produce sustainable savings, economic growth or carbon reduction. Or…perhaps they are indeed fully complicit in this crime. Big industry and Government clearly do not care about our health but surely the Council members overseeing this atrocity are also local people and need to know of the dangers of proliferating wireless technology and especially 5G, because what they are doing will most certainly harm and kill people including their own families.

A top UK scientist was asked by the government to test 5G. He said ok great it will take 15 years, 10 years to test and 5 years to gather and process findings. The government said no we want you to test it for 10 minutes.  He said “you are going to kill people”. He had to do the 10 minute testing and wishes to remain anonymous. That is not biological testing, That is seeing if a fluid filled dummy head heats up in a few minutes or such like.

You can see a little more about this technology on the following links.

https://www.bluwireless.co.uk/liverpool-5g-health-social-care-testbed-extended-for-a-year-with-1-48m-in-extra-funding/

https://www.bluwireless.co.uk/five-key-learnings-from-the-liverpool-5g-health-and-social-care-showcase-event/

https://www.bluwireless.co.uk/why-delivering-ultra-fast-5g-connections-to-uk-trains-is-globally-significant/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xRP2GvIVW4

The attached pictures show some of the Council meeting in action.

 

In the meantime, the rest of the 5G roll out seems to be controlled by private mobile operators and no permission is required to install 5G on existing infrastructure and planning applications do not need to state 5G. So, it is almost impossible to ascertain what is being rolled out and where, certainly the Council do not know when information is requested. 

This is a typical response from the Council…”mobile broadband will be the first application of 5G to be rolled out commercially. The roll-out of 5G mobile broadband is led by commercial mobile network operators (MNOs) and roll-out plans are not usually publicly available. Some MNOs have begun 5G trials and announced early network roll-out plans beginning in 2019. Trials for 5G applications and use cases are ongoing, for example, through the Government’s 5G Testbeds and Trials programme. The type and scale of 5G applications is still unknown and developing. Further information about 5G can be found via the parliamentary research briefing: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7883
On 24th February, a Freedom of Information Request was submitted to Wirral Council regarding 5G technology. The status of 5G technology in Wirral will be clearer once the authority publishes their response: 
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/4g_and_5g_plans#outgoing-869490’’

So, it is clear that even against the woefully inadequate ICNIRP guidelines no ‘body’ is even capable of testing that radiation levels are not exceeded in any one location as, even if they had a testing team, no one even knows what is being installed, by which company and where! As you cannot see, taste or touch radiation, people will only know from adverse health effects by which time it is too late, the damage is done. Many people will (and are already) suffer from electro hypersensitivity but as there is no danger according to ICNIRP, no council or doctor will take them seriously or care. Not so long ago corrupt industry science convinced everyone, including doctors who prescribed smoking to their patients for sore throats that smoking was good for you.

As you can hopefully see by now there is no need for 5G at all for the public and the health risks and issues from forced exposure surely far outweigh any benefits. 5G has so far been halted in Florida, Switzerland, Belgium and more as local residents and scientists are concerned about the health aspect. No testing can prove that it is safe, because quite simply it is not. 5G is a weapons grade, directed energy beam forming control grid. 

Finally, just to point out….5G and wireless technology will NOT save us from climate change as the new insane push by ‘Smart England’ and industry advertising will have you believe. This point is ominously missed out from all climate and extinction discussions in the industry sponsored media and frenzy to install 5G, sell electric vehicles and all manner of smart products: 

  • 5G will use more energy and increase pollution by encouraging us to unnecessarily replace existing devices and buy new devices that use energy to be manufactured and powered.
  • 5G will increase misery for children down mines in areas of the world where conflict minerals are mined to power the RF chips and batteries.
  • 5G will increase toxic landfill as old, perfectly functioning, devises are dis-guarded and sent to landfill or sifted through by children in the 3rd world dumps for a dollar a day.
  • 5G will increase energy usage as the internet and data centres require VAST amounts of energy to process and store the data.
  • 5G will encourage even more unsociability in the young as they are glued to HD videos, mobile games and virtual reality.
  • 5G will increase global warming as massive amounts of rocket fuel are required to launch supporting satellites. Ozone will be destroyed.
  • 5G satellites will give off massive amounts of micro and milli meter waves into the upper atmosphere from space based infrastructure.
  • Mmwave radiation from ground based 5G infrastructure will beam directly into our homes and bedrooms.
  • 5G will replace jobs in factories, transport, farming, teaching, healthcare and more.
  • 5G will monitor and record your every move.
  • 5G radiation will damage health, kill insects, birds and wildlife and contribute massively to the destruction of the already delicate environment. If 5G is deployed we really are likely to only have 12 years left before every living creature, including ourselves is extinct.
  • Trees and hedges will be felled to make way for the 5G signals to pass.
  • 5G is NOT smart!
  • 5G is NOT green!
  • 5G is NOT essential to the economy, health or social care.

Governments, Councils and Industry continue to deny that wireless radiation is harmful to health and the environment even though this has been known for decades and despite the fact that hundreds of scientists across the globe are urgently calling for caution with wireless exposure and halt 5G. Industry and Governments are now frantically using the ‘Climate Change’ emergency to dupe the unsuspecting public into accepting the push for the ‘Smart Agenda’ of which 5G, LED lampposts with 5G transmitters and smart meters form the basis of the ground infrastructure grid. Most people are blissfully unaware of the horror the space based radiation plans. Thousands of satellites are also planned which will utilise enormous quantities of rocket fuel capable, in itself, of increasing global warming by several degrees. 20-40 % of ALL available power in the world is projected to be required to cool and power huge data centres for the data Cloud. 

5G and the Internet of Things is NOT SMART, NOT GREEN and NOT ESSENTIAL to the economy. It is however, a radiation grid that will be inescapable and will allow total control over every aspect of our lives with this weapons grade technology. 

Still don’t believe the dangers of 5G…

Below are some links to further reading. There are many many more and others in our previous articles.

https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal

https://ehtrust.org/

https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/5G-Small-Cell-Scientist-Letters-PDF-.pdf

https://electrosmogrx.com/guide/

https://www.5gexposed.com/2018/07/30/dr-martin-pall-phd-his-letter-to-governor-jerry-brown/

https://merseymash.com/2019/03/21/revolutionary-5g-testing-in-liverpool-and-its-potentially-deadly-effects/?fbclid=IwAR1KFTaf8_oZa5GtWnYUWVBudmqYg_kZGkcoZoQbCnbYAVBAPxrDdldmtk0

9 thoughts on “5G Whizz

  1. Speaking as a former local authority street lighting designer, I can state with confidence that although I left the role almost ten years ago, the provision of public street lighting is a power and not a duty.

    But what does this mean in plain language? Well, the advantage to your local council is a purely financial one. Under this arrangement, should you be walking along the road and injure yourself in the reduced visibility beneath a broken street light, there’s a very good chance that you will not be able to build a claim against them for negligence or failure to maintain their equipment. Because they are not duty-bound to provide those lampposts and lights in the first place.

    Here’s a court case expanding on this point, which involves my former employer, Cheshire West & Chester Council. I finally left this employer (and there lies a tale) just a month before this incident:

    Be careful where you walk: failure to maintain street lighting does not make local authorities liable  

    The very latest…

    I’ve just learned today from extremely clued-up campaigner Ian R Crane that British Telecom-owned company EE is planning to launch 5G in 6 UK cities; London, Cardiff, Belfast, Edinburgh, Birmingham & Manchester starting at the end of May… (the end of May – there’s some wishful thinking on the ongoing, calculated ‘chaos’ of Brexit):

    https://minutehack.com/news/ee-to-launch-uk-5g-network-on-may-30

    Although the regulatory authorities are extremely keen to have Chinese firm Huawei jumping through hoops to obtain their 5G certifications, matters are rather more relaxed when it comes to providing the public with some – any – reassurance that the technology is not hazardous to human health.

    You see, in the rush to provide us with superfast broadband and themselves with eye-watering profits, they haven’t been required by UK government or its regulatory partners to conduct any adequate safety tests.

    This dangerous ‘cart before the horse’ situation also applies in the United States and elsewhere.

    And finally…the crux of this…

    As the provision of public street lighting is a power and not a duty, when a local authority agrees to make its lighting stock available for dual-purpose use, that of enabling a technologically advanced, although thoroughly dubious, non-safety tested telecommunications network, which is invisibly zapping out microwaves in all directions, often at high power, then matters get quite complicated.

    Local authorities, be they County, Unitary, District or Parish councils all have one thing in common; a constitution. Here’s a link to the constitution of my local council, Wirral.

    https://www.wirral.gov.uk/councillors-and-committees/constitution-council

    I echo the words of Ian R Crane here. Let’s examine these documents, find the public pledges they’ve made and hold their feet to the fire.

    From page 8, for example, here’s something you, Wirral reader, were probably not aware of. So the next time Councillor Bloggs tries to close you down or fob you off, hold his feet to the fire and quote it back at him:

    “The Council welcomes participation by its citizens in its work…”
    ——————————————————

    As for the power and duty thing, how can a council potentially say to you as a citizen in the near future that they have a duty to help citizens achieve superfast 5G connection speeds, if the equipment they’re talking about is mounted on a lamppost which they had *absolutely no duty* to provide?

    Radio Frequency (RF) has been determined a potential carcinogen by the World Health Organisation.

    The RF signal may not breach the walls, but it will stream through the glass of your windows and bounce around the room. If your baby or toddler is put to bed for 10 to 12 hours every night in the vicinity of a 5G, microwave emitting, street lighting lantern-mounted transceiver, i.e. between 3 and 5 metres away from it – and your baby develops a cancer – did the council exceed their power by agreeing to have the offending 5G transceiver fitted on top of a street lighting lantern, *which they had no duty* to install?

    Currently, it seems to me that councils may want it both ways, i.e. no responsibility in law for failing to maintain their lighting equipment and then the facility to rebuff any potential claims should personal injury cases arise connected to the retrofitting of non-safety tested, potentially hazardous 5G infrastructure.

    https://twitter.com/Wirral_In_It/status/1131829401103077377?s=19

  2. BOOMERANG…

    ‘We have given them almost six years to own up and say it was all wrong, they’ve lied, cheated, hidden stuff, obfuscated and told bare faced lies.’

    (James Griffiths, the Aussie, on the Wirral Biz/Council scandal)

    • G’day “Intie”

      Saw the “Highbrow” today and walked with him knowing I was safe.

      He had the “high viz” on.

      I think “Legweak” the little weasel could get his own back for being outed by confirming all “Philly “FUCKING” Liar’s” lies around the Wirral “Funny” Bizz £2,000,000.00 knock off on his way out the door.

      Ooroo

      James

      If not he can go and rot in hell for supporting the pink faced fat arsed mamby pamby boy from caldy.

      Curse every barstard that supported “Philly “FUCKING” Liar’s” rotten untruths and……… for what.

      All 65 of the scum bags.

      Luv yer “Intie” XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

      • Saw Ade Jones this morning, James.

        Had a wee chat with him about an apparent conflict of interest re: the small matter of his wife’s declared ongoing employment at the Wirral & Cheshire NHS Trust which unfortunately coincides with her Co-Chairmanship of the Wirral Council Joint Strategic Commissioning Board.

        I asked him the key question, “How does your wife commission her own job?” I then stated that surely this was a conflict of interest. He responded that it had never occurred to him and he didn’t know.

        Anyway, this key Council gathering is the very Joint Strategic Commissioning Board that has shown itself to be ultra-keen to farm out Wirral’s embattled NHS services to a pack of US private health wolves whom – once ushered in through the door by Jones and Co – will pounce on the ailing NHS beast, tear it limb from limb and then turn on each other and gobble each other up, resulting in one big, fat, private wolf strutting around, alone on the desolate Wirral prairie.

        It will spend its time prowling the landscape, collecting Health Insurance payments from ill people, and picking off humans one by one who can’t afford to either pay in the first place, or who cannot stump up the ever-increasing premiums.

        I’ve contacted Philip McCourt tonight to see what he’s got to say about this abnormal situation at the most improved council.

        Cheers !

      • G’day Paul

        Sounds very fucking familiar.

        When “Highbrow” told the little welsh egit and Missus Bilong Him Nurse Rat they feigned disgust.

        Then for three years he ket telling “Highbrow” he didn’t understand accounting.

        What fucking use are they?

        I bet you he says he has an audit trail on his whole life that shows he has had nothing to do with his wife or Wirral “Funny” Bizz, Philly “FUCKING” Liar” and Old Tom Cobbly.

        Ooroo

        James

        The man is a compulsive liar.

        But hey how many hundreds of thousands of pounds has him and “Nurse Rat” taken from the coffers of Wirral?

        Who’s the fools?

        Luv Paul X

  3. This is just unbelievable and totally devastating why does our country/government only care for profit over our health and our children’s health and wildlife our earth I carnt believe what I’m reading and how they are allowed to get away with all this it’s just pure madness and needs stopping now I’m horrified!!!!!!

Leave a reply to James Griffiths Cancel reply