5G : ‘The public have a right to know’

Screen Shot 2019-06-30 at 21.57.36.png

This week has seen Britain’s first court case against 5G – and the people won!

The Humans Are Free website reports :

Mark Steele, a 5G campaigner, has been highlighting the dangers of a secret 5G rollout by Gateshead Council where residents are complaining of increased illness and cancer in the affected area…

Gateshead Council were found to have misused police powers to gag Mark Steele and yesterday he left a free man and Gateshead Council to fork out £11k of taxpayers money to cover the court cost amounting to woeful ignorance.

In Court, none of the Council Officers could explain what 5G is; and their leading Government expert refused to attend the Court hearing. In conclusion, the Judge refused to gag Mark, stating:

“The public have a right to know.”

Read full story here

Meanwhile taking up the baton locally we have campaign group No5G Wirral who have sent us the following message :

Please find below a petition to Wirral Council that we have set up. 
Please could you sign and share with as many people as you are able.

5G Whizz

The latest from our ‘5G Whizz’ – don’t say you weren’t told:

More on 5G and 5G testing in Liverpool

Liverpool and Wirral Councils, in combination with telecom companies, have been quietly rolling out the 5G infrastructure grid WITHOUT SAFETY TESTING, WITHOUT CONSULTATION, WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE and WITHOUT APPROVAL TO BE EXPERIMENTED UPON. 

As discussed in previous articles 5G is NOT an upgrade to 4G. 5G phased array, beam forming small cells will be everywhere and will forcibly expose everyone to hundreds of times the radiation levels that we have already been exposed to by 2G, 3G, 4G, GPS, WiFi and Bluetooth devises. As a reminder the ONLY safety testing that the ICNIRP guidelines expect Councils, Government and Industry to work to is if one single devise does not heat up a fluid filled dummy head by 2 degrees over a short c. 6 minute exposure. There is and never has been ANY biological safety testing on continuous exposure and to multiple frequencies and devises. Many people are already unknowingly suffering from radiation related exposure health issues such as anxiety, depression, sleeplessness, tinnitus, behavioural issues, rashes, memory loss, infertility as well as increased levels of autism, dementia and cancer to name a few. Birds and insects continue to decline unable to withstand the radiation fields. Mature trees and hedges are felled to remove signal obstacles.

Liverpool City Council has been given over £200m to roll out an unlicensed 5G network across Kensington in Liverpool.  Unlicensed meaning they will use their own network and not have to pay the telecoms company for using theirs.

Blu Wireless are providing much of the technology in the form of nodes to be attached to street lamps, street furniture, under manhole covers and on buildings. As millimetre wave technology cannot effectively pass through trees or walls they have to get around this. Trees will get felled although there aren’t many trees in Kensington so this may not be so obvious here. However, this explains the mass tree fellings taking place across Liverpool, the Wirral, the rail network and the UK. Trees are 5G obstacles…this is a FACT…and was heard directly from the horse’s mouth at a recent Council meeting. To get around concrete, the nodes will also be attached to buildings such as care homes, old people’s homes, possible schools. No permission is needed unless you own your own house. This will create a spider web of intense, inescapable wireless radiation. The council aim to equip 66,000 street lamps with the nodes effectively blanketing Liverpool and the Wirral with this lethal technology.

So, what are some of the plans for 5G in the Kensington test bed and the insane rationale for this rapidly proliferating crime against humanity and the environment?…

The Council claim that 60% of people in Kensington don’t have access to the internet and that 5G will improve health and social care….mmmm….how caring and benevolent.  This seems just as unlikely a connection as how the new ‘smart meter’ push adverts are trying to convince us that irradiating us and collecting our data will help us ‘breath clean air’.

They claim that there are lots of children in the Kensington area that cannot do their homework because they don’t have access to the internet. As the families would still need to buy access to the 5G internet data and buy a laptop, tablet or computer, it seems illogical how 5G will help as 4G would still do the trick. No such thing as a free lunch. Families and schools should be encouraged / helped to have safe hardwired (non WiFi/non mobile) access to the internet to minimise radiation exposure to their growing children and safeguard their health.  This would improve health and social care, not 5G.

Cancers take many years to develop. All children and young adults have now been exposed to wireless cell phone and WiFi radiation since in the womb and it seems no coincidence that cancer rates in the under 15’s are now around 1 in 5 with cancer rates in the population at 1 in 2. Oh well….at least the children can do their homework with a 5G node installed outside their bedroom window exposing them to hundreds of times the radiation levels we already have. Phew, our future is secure.

Meanwhile, the old and vulnerable can silently increase their risk of dementia and degenerative diseases whilst talking to their virtual wireless assistant (i.e. spying devise) warming themselves on the 5G network radiation spewing into their homes. The planned Medi Hub devices equipped with a camera are intended to save the council money on having to send carers out to check on them. The device will ring like a phone and the person will answer, someone from a central hub will watch them take their medication etc. the call will end. These soulless devices have been getting trialled out and the users are reportedly not happy as they have been told to keep everything plugged in where they would normally switch things off for safety reasons and to save money on electricity. Leaving things on totally goes against any advise you would get off an electrician or fire safety officer or to save the climate. Their energy bills will increase but don’t worry, they will no doubt have a smart meter pulsing radiation into their homes every 10 seconds monitoring their usage and movements back to a central hub. In a recent Council meeting, they only seemed concerned with how to ensure old people left every electrical wireless devise on, no mention of testing the health effects of radiation and isolation. Such an ill conceived plan will not only lead to radiation increased illness, it will also definitely lead to terrible isolation as the carer might be the only person they see which in turn will lead to a deterioration in physical and mental health costing the NHS more money. But no worries, a premature ending will save money in the end.

Medi Hub owner Paman confirmed that this technology could in fact also run off 3G and 4G.  Children should most definitely also be using hard-wired connections to minimise wireless exposure. So, just on these two counts alone, it begs the question, why are the Council so keen to roll out 5G under the guise of improving health and social care? Money and control might come into the mix along with conveniently having laid the infrastructure for other technologies and promised savings such as connected autonomous vehicles which will pierce pedestrians and cyclists bodies with c. 25 high frequency beams on each vehicle beam forming to the nearest lamppost; Transport jobs will be lost; Jobs, as well as health, will be lost in factories with AI and robotics; and cows will be tortured with 5G radiation devises around their necks as they enter automatic milking machines during their miserable farming ordeal. Some more great cost savings there. But hey, you can download an HD video in under one second with 5G and sit on the couch waiting for your fast food drone delivery, so all good.

The fact is 5G will involve a massive increase in forced radiation exposure to children (who will be encouraged to spend even more time in front of their addictive tablet devises) and old vulnerable people (who will have their care workers removed and replaced with spying camera devises). Oh, we nearly forgot…”as rising rates of stress and burnout for healthcare professionals coincide with increased demand for personalised patient care, 5G technology provides a solution that takes the pressure off all parties”, according to the manufactures. What an improvement for health and social care, a total success for the test bed!!!  Every living creature will be unable to escape the radiation web….certainly the ICNIRP has never performed a safety test on insects, birds, plants, bacteria, let alone a living human cell.

The council have perhaps been paid a lot of money and promised a lot of savings to roll this out. Perhaps they have just been misled. Perhaps they haven’t thought twice about the health side of it or conducted even the most basic research other than blindly believing the ICNIRP safety mantra. Perhaps they actually really believe the blatant lies that irradiating every living creature with this technology will help produce sustainable savings, economic growth or carbon reduction. Or…perhaps they are indeed fully complicit in this crime. Big industry and Government clearly do not care about our health but surely the Council members overseeing this atrocity are also local people and need to know of the dangers of proliferating wireless technology and especially 5G, because what they are doing will most certainly harm and kill people including their own families.

A top UK scientist was asked by the government to test 5G. He said ok great it will take 15 years, 10 years to test and 5 years to gather and process findings. The government said no we want you to test it for 10 minutes.  He said “you are going to kill people”. He had to do the 10 minute testing and wishes to remain anonymous. That is not biological testing, That is seeing if a fluid filled dummy head heats up in a few minutes or such like.

You can see a little more about this technology on the following links.

https://www.bluwireless.co.uk/liverpool-5g-health-social-care-testbed-extended-for-a-year-with-1-48m-in-extra-funding/

https://www.bluwireless.co.uk/five-key-learnings-from-the-liverpool-5g-health-and-social-care-showcase-event/

https://www.bluwireless.co.uk/why-delivering-ultra-fast-5g-connections-to-uk-trains-is-globally-significant/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xRP2GvIVW4

The attached pictures show some of the Council meeting in action.

 

In the meantime, the rest of the 5G roll out seems to be controlled by private mobile operators and no permission is required to install 5G on existing infrastructure and planning applications do not need to state 5G. So, it is almost impossible to ascertain what is being rolled out and where, certainly the Council do not know when information is requested. 

This is a typical response from the Council…”mobile broadband will be the first application of 5G to be rolled out commercially. The roll-out of 5G mobile broadband is led by commercial mobile network operators (MNOs) and roll-out plans are not usually publicly available. Some MNOs have begun 5G trials and announced early network roll-out plans beginning in 2019. Trials for 5G applications and use cases are ongoing, for example, through the Government’s 5G Testbeds and Trials programme. The type and scale of 5G applications is still unknown and developing. Further information about 5G can be found via the parliamentary research briefing: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7883
On 24th February, a Freedom of Information Request was submitted to Wirral Council regarding 5G technology. The status of 5G technology in Wirral will be clearer once the authority publishes their response: 
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/4g_and_5g_plans#outgoing-869490’’

So, it is clear that even against the woefully inadequate ICNIRP guidelines no ‘body’ is even capable of testing that radiation levels are not exceeded in any one location as, even if they had a testing team, no one even knows what is being installed, by which company and where! As you cannot see, taste or touch radiation, people will only know from adverse health effects by which time it is too late, the damage is done. Many people will (and are already) suffer from electro hypersensitivity but as there is no danger according to ICNIRP, no council or doctor will take them seriously or care. Not so long ago corrupt industry science convinced everyone, including doctors who prescribed smoking to their patients for sore throats that smoking was good for you.

As you can hopefully see by now there is no need for 5G at all for the public and the health risks and issues from forced exposure surely far outweigh any benefits. 5G has so far been halted in Florida, Switzerland, Belgium and more as local residents and scientists are concerned about the health aspect. No testing can prove that it is safe, because quite simply it is not. 5G is a weapons grade, directed energy beam forming control grid. 

Finally, just to point out….5G and wireless technology will NOT save us from climate change as the new insane push by ‘Smart England’ and industry advertising will have you believe. This point is ominously missed out from all climate and extinction discussions in the industry sponsored media and frenzy to install 5G, sell electric vehicles and all manner of smart products: 

  • 5G will use more energy and increase pollution by encouraging us to unnecessarily replace existing devices and buy new devices that use energy to be manufactured and powered.
  • 5G will increase misery for children down mines in areas of the world where conflict minerals are mined to power the RF chips and batteries.
  • 5G will increase toxic landfill as old, perfectly functioning, devises are dis-guarded and sent to landfill or sifted through by children in the 3rd world dumps for a dollar a day.
  • 5G will increase energy usage as the internet and data centres require VAST amounts of energy to process and store the data.
  • 5G will encourage even more unsociability in the young as they are glued to HD videos, mobile games and virtual reality.
  • 5G will increase global warming as massive amounts of rocket fuel are required to launch supporting satellites. Ozone will be destroyed.
  • 5G satellites will give off massive amounts of micro and milli meter waves into the upper atmosphere from space based infrastructure.
  • Mmwave radiation from ground based 5G infrastructure will beam directly into our homes and bedrooms.
  • 5G will replace jobs in factories, transport, farming, teaching, healthcare and more.
  • 5G will monitor and record your every move.
  • 5G radiation will damage health, kill insects, birds and wildlife and contribute massively to the destruction of the already delicate environment. If 5G is deployed we really are likely to only have 12 years left before every living creature, including ourselves is extinct.
  • Trees and hedges will be felled to make way for the 5G signals to pass.
  • 5G is NOT smart!
  • 5G is NOT green!
  • 5G is NOT essential to the economy, health or social care.

Governments, Councils and Industry continue to deny that wireless radiation is harmful to health and the environment even though this has been known for decades and despite the fact that hundreds of scientists across the globe are urgently calling for caution with wireless exposure and halt 5G. Industry and Governments are now frantically using the ‘Climate Change’ emergency to dupe the unsuspecting public into accepting the push for the ‘Smart Agenda’ of which 5G, LED lampposts with 5G transmitters and smart meters form the basis of the ground infrastructure grid. Most people are blissfully unaware of the horror the space based radiation plans. Thousands of satellites are also planned which will utilise enormous quantities of rocket fuel capable, in itself, of increasing global warming by several degrees. 20-40 % of ALL available power in the world is projected to be required to cool and power huge data centres for the data Cloud. 

5G and the Internet of Things is NOT SMART, NOT GREEN and NOT ESSENTIAL to the economy. It is however, a radiation grid that will be inescapable and will allow total control over every aspect of our lives with this weapons grade technology. 

Still don’t believe the dangers of 5G…

Below are some links to further reading. There are many many more and others in our previous articles.

https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal

https://ehtrust.org/

https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/5G-Small-Cell-Scientist-Letters-PDF-.pdf

https://electrosmogrx.com/guide/

https://www.5gexposed.com/2018/07/30/dr-martin-pall-phd-his-letter-to-governor-jerry-brown/

Revolutionary 5G testing in Liverpool and its potentially deadly effects

Radiant Health

The latest from ‘Bright Spark’ concerns about existing wireless technology, the planned 5G roll out and how to reduce your exposure to high frequency radiation…

5G latest

This week we would like to share some tips on how to reduce your exposure to current levels of RF radiation to protect your friends and family. We sincerely hope that you will continue to research this topic and take measures to both reduce levels in your own life, reduce wireless technology usage and stand up against the imminent and even more dangerous 5G roll out.

It is currently almost impossible to avoid high frequency RF microwave radiation thanks to the inadequate ‘safety guidelines’ that the entire industry has been allowed to roll out against along with the almost entire UK coverage of 2G, 3G & 4G as well as WiFi in nearly every home and public place. Forced and unconsented exposure has also increased dramatically with the ill-conceived roll out of smart meters and LED lampposts (see previous posts for further information).

Hopefully, one day sooner rather than later (if we all wake up before it is too late) we will have WiFi ‘free’ (instead of free WiFi) homes, schools, workplaces, café’s and public transport etc. once people finally realise the catastrophic harm that this wireless technology has already done to our health and that of our children and the environment. Using your phone, laptop or tech wirelessly will hopefully, one day, be akin to the now shocking prospect of a teacher lighting up a cigarette in the classroom or people smoking in trains, planes, and public places or in their children’s bedroom. Yet, we happily invite DNA altering, cancer causing, neurologically damaging non-ionising radiation into every area of our home and public place to power our wireless technology. Perhaps we would not have done so had the government and industry told the truth about the damage this would cause. Perhaps life would not fall apart if we rejected wireless technology, in the same way that it did not when the smoking ban in public places finally came into force, which should have been done many years prior and immediately once the dangers were known. Unlike smoking, wireless radiation cannot be seen, smelt or felt and trespasses through walls and windows. Exposure is insidious and unavoidable.

It may be hard to hear with our addiction to smartphones, ‘smart’ tech and wirelesses technology but this is already having disastrous health and environmental impacts. ‘Smart’ has been cleverly positioned from a marketing perspective. After all, would you really want to be the only one not to be ‘smart’ and/or to buy something if it were called a ‘microwave emitting, cancer causing spying’ device?

Currently, one can at least try and take some measures to protect your family by limiting wireless usage, switching off your WiFi and hardwiring, refusing smart meters, not buying smart tech with RF chips installed and limiting smart phone use to essential calls and texts rather than downloading videos and using every conceivable app. This is especially important around children. Although insects, birds, plants and wildlife do not have this luxury. Insects with their small body weights to surface area ratio are not capable of withstanding the current levels of non-ionising radiation. Their numbers have declined dramatically in the last 10-15 years since the introduction of 2G etc. and WiFi. Without insects there will be no life…period. How much more risk are we prepared to accept for faster download speeds, driverless cars and for the industry to make insane profits at everyone’s expense. Tech leaders in Silicone Valley do not allow their children to be exposed to WiFi, ipad’s and smartphones….we wonder why?!

5G will be a much stronger and more damaging signal by a factor of c. x100 and will be a global, environmental and health catastrophe and it will be inescapable with small cells placed on lampposts and every 2-10 houses. The ONLY WAY to protect against 5G is to STOP IT being rolled out and under no circumstances buy into a 5G enabled smart phone, car or any supporting technology.

Please see previous posts for links to supporting evidence and studies of harm of RF radiation, especially the work of Dr Martin Pall.

Please spread this information and take action in your own area of control. Do not accept smart meters or 5G in your area. Encourage your friends, neighbours and loved ones to do the same.

Some ways in which you can reduce your exposure include:

In your own home:

Reduce mobile download and 4G usage wherever possible and do your internet work on a hardwired computer wherever practical.
Avoid mindless mobile surfing of the net to avoid boredom, every piece of data you don’t download reduces demand on cell towers and hopefully their increasing numbers.
Turn WiFi off when not in use, especially at night and hardwire your home completely where practical.
Replace cordless DECT phones in your home with a wired phone. Cordless phones are very deceiving and constantly emit a high level of radiation even when not in use.
Turn phones, ipads, laptops etc. onto airplane mode when not in use or when you are using a hardwire. They still try to continually establish transmission when not in use, in standby or when hardwired if not in airplane mode.
Remove or disable all apps and functions on your phone if not required and disable the mobile update functions. Turn off the Bluetooth, WiFi and mobile data functions when not in use as these continuously try to establish transmission when not in use in your pocket next to vital organs. Ideally turn onto airplane mode when in your pocket or a public place and especially at night.
Turn off any smart TVs and smart devises off at the wall when not in use. They still transmit microwaves trying to establish transmission to the WiFi or Bluetooth even when in standby mode and on most devices you cannot disable these functions.
Reduce or stop the use of games consoles and make sure they are completely off when not in use as they constantly emit RF radiation.
Do not use wireless baby monitors. These emit very aggressive microwaves signals right next to your infant.
Avoid wireless technology including speakers, headsets and wearables such as smart watches and fit bits. Smart watches emit a strong microwave signal directly into your main radial artery damaging blood cells as they circulate throughout your body.
Do not use Alexa’s and Echo’s or similar devises. These constantly emit RF radiation and encourage you to purchase even more wireless devices. Not only that, every word you speak in your home is no longer private.
Check all new electronic purchases carefully to ensure they are not ‘smart’ or contain an RF chip that cannot be disabled. If you cannot buy an alternative, do not buy it.
Refuse smart meters and do not be pressurised into getting one. If you have one already, take every measure to get this removed and changed to a safer analogue version. Do not accept a dumbed down version.
Under no circumstances buy a 5G enabled phone, device or car etc.

In the wider community:

Challenge your schools and workplaces use of WiFi and mobile technology showing them the evidence of harm.
Contact your council, government and industry to register your objections to the roll out of 5G as well as the proliferation of cell towers, smart meters, LED lampposts and wireless technology in public places, outside homes, parks and the natural environment etc. State that you DO NOT CONSENT to your forcible, unconsented and illegal exposure.
If you are in a council, government, industry, media or influential position, do not stand by and toe the party line and be complicit in this destruction of our/your health, the environment and every living creature at this critical time. Use your influence positively to make a stand and help make the change to reduce wireless and promote wired technology.

Despite what big wireless, big telecoms, the media and government are telling us, wireless technology is not safe to cellular and biological functions. Perhaps we could survive economically without 5G, smart meters, LED lamp posts with transmitters, driverless cars, all things wireless and the IoT’s after all. We did for millions of years. Our physical and mental health has never deteriorated at this rate since their introduction. Of course, there are other factors including pollution, GMO’s, poor food choices, pesticides etc. but the evidence of RF radiation harm is real and has rapidly covered the earth. Perhaps, rather than focusing on faster download speeds and connecting every devise to the Internet of Things so you can turn on your lights without getting up off the couch…saving our health and that of the next generation along with the insects, pollinators, birds and trees that support us might prove rather more beneficial to us all.

To make any changes millions of voices and careful individual purchasing changes are required. Do not assume someone else will take action.

In our next articles we will highlight some of the Liverpool and Wirral’s plans for 5G and hope you will join us in standing up against this untested, dangerous and unconsented exposure.

5G Or Not 5G?

WL - Post 5 Picture

The latest from our correspondent ‘Bright Spark’ and research undertaken on the planned 5G rollout across Merseyside and the UK. Again the information is posted for information and discussion.

Over the past few weeks we have brought your attention to the new LED lampposts which produce both a hormone disrupting blue/white LED light as well as house a 5G ready microwave transmitter under the guise of a lighting control system. We then focused on some of the health issues associated with existing wireless technology levels that we are already overexposed to (2G,3G,4G, wifi, smart meters and any number of wireless smart devices) and the inadequate ICNIRP guidelines which PHE, the council, government and industry quote and against which they have allowed the uncontrolled wireless industry to proliferate into our homes, schools, streets and public places.

This week we will bring the spotlight to 5G which is intended to power the insane internet of things (IoT’s). With the IoT’s, it is intended that almost every device (from cars to nappies) will connect together via the internet along with providing instant download speeds, drones, driverless cars, AI, robotics, facial recognition and any number of, as yet inconceivable, technologies, population monitoring and control devises. Oh sorry….it will benefit us all and is absolutely essential for the economy…with no harm whatsoever according to the government and industry!!!

ICNIRP/PHE and councils will say that there ‘is no evidence of harm’ from 5G technology. However, the wireless industry confesses ‘no studies show that 5G is safe’ (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/wireless-industry-confesses-no-studies-show-5g-safe?utm_source=Daily+Greenmedinfo.com+Email+List&utm_campaign=161b4c2495-5G&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_193c8492fb-161b4c2495-91570161&ct=t(5G)&mc_cid=161b4c2495&mc_eid=b4d6d6ef78). Brussels has just become the first major European city to halt 5G due to concerns about health effects (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/brussels-becomes-first-major-city-halt-5g-due-health-effects?utm_source=Daily+Greenmedinfo.com+Email+List&utm_campaign=161b4c2495-5G&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_193c8492fb-161b4c2495-91570161&ct=t(5G)&mc_cid=161b4c2495&mc_eid=b4d6d6ef78). And yet Liverpool and However the Liverpool City Region, including Wirral Council,  about to subject us all to this  technology, starting with Kensington in Liverpool and areas around Everton.

“Allowing this technology [5G] to be used without proving its safety is reckless in the extreme, as the millimeter waves are known to have a profound effect on all parts of the human body.” 
~ Prof. Trevor Marshall, Director Autoimmunity Research Foundation, California

Councils and utility companies working for Big Telecom and government are, right now, quietly in the process of installing powerful Fifth Generation (5G) cellular antenna on existing cell towers, utility poles, street lights, rooftops, traffic signals, under manholes etc. 5G, which is being sold as the economic saviour and panacea of download speeds that users cannot live without, will in fact take radiation exposure to a whole new and existentially dangerous level. This fact is conveniently not mentioned to the public, there has been no public consultation, and there is no mention in the mainstream media of the dangers of RF radiation as they clearly also stand to make huge profits from media platforms. Most people still remain blissfully unaware of what 5G even is and the very imminent plans across the Wirral and the UK that the Liverpool and Wirral Councils are supporting and allowing telecoms companies to roll out as they wish. Kensington in Liverpool is one of the first areas to be turned on with the area to be blanketed with 5G small cells and millimetre waves. It will be inescapable.

What you are not being told is that 5G is not just an upgrade to 4G. It will utilise both existing frequency bands along with much higher frequency millimetre wave bands. These high frequencies (up to 125 G Hz or more) have been recently auctioned off by the government at vast profits. (Wifi for e.g. is 2.4 GHz, with new wifi’s operating at 5GHz). These higher 5G ultra high frequency waves(up to 125 Ghz) are millimetre waves and are used in military weapons. Miraculously they are being positioned as safe on our streets.

The following article is one of many that clearly explains the exponential harm of the effects of the ‘phased array’ antenna used in 5G phones and small cells that will be inescapable:

https://emfacademy.com/5g-radiation/

As ultra high frequency 5G signals do not travel so far and are more easily blocked by obstacles, these small cells will be outside every 2-10 houses.  This will force involuntary exposure to wireless radiation 24/7 which cannot be turned off or avoided!

The impending 5G roll out is set to massively increase exposure to RF radiation by a factor of hundreds and full UK and world coverage is planned in the next few years.

What is 5G? 5G is a developing and growing complex collection of technologies including:-

Millimetre waves using new much higher (and even more dangerous) frequency spectrums than existing 3G and 4G.
Many thousands of new small cells everywhere as millimetre waves do not travel so far ensuring that they are located very close to homes
Massive MIMO. Each 5G base station will contain hundreds or thousands of antennas aiming multiple laser-like beams simultaneously at all cell phones and user devices in its service area. This technology is called “multiple input multiple output” or MIMO. FCC rules permit the effective radiated power of a 5G base station’s beams to be as much as hundreds of times more powerful than the levels permitted for current base stations.
Full duplex

The following gives a short explanation of the above.

Even more alarmingly, there are also plans to launch thousands of satellites into space to cover the entire globe with 5G, leaving no area of the world or it’s delicate electomagnetic atmosphere untouched.

ICNIRP insist there is ‘no evidence that it is not safe’ without providing any credible proof that it is safe biologically (oh sorry we forgot, as our last article explained….it doesn’t heat a fluid filled test dummy up by 2 degrees in 6 minutes….so of course it is perfectly safe!!!). This is because it is not safe and no credible non-industry sponsored scientific testing would be able to prove otherwise.

Some of frequencies used in 5G are known to interfere with cellular processes. 60 Ghz, for example, interferes with the oxygen molecule and others are used in new microwave weapons called active denial and growlers for crowd control.

Barry Trower, an ex UK navy weapons expert, explains many of the issues with wireless technology and 5G in these any many of his other videos:

The following article is an appeal signed by hundreds of scientists across the world appealing to governments to halt the roll out of 5G and explains the exponentially harmful effects of 5G on health, wildlife as well as the environment and atmosphere and is worth the time to review. THIS IS BEING IGNORED BY COUNCILS AND THE GOVERNMENT.

https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal

All life has adapted over time to live in the electromagnetic frequencies of the earths Schumann Resonance, somewhere between 7.83 and 8 Hz (i.e. 8 cycles per second). Researchers have shown that there is a key connection between the Schumann Resonance and the brain’s alpha states (frequencies between 8 Hz – 12 Hz). The Schumann Resonance is essentially the pulse of the heart of the earth, to which our hearts and brains are specifically attuned with. The Schumann Resonance is a geomagnetic electric resonance between the surface of the earth and the lower levels of the ionosphere, which has a natural ultra-low frequency signal. Without doubt it will be disrupted by 5G ground based infrastructure and satellites, and thus would disrupt the basic harmonic of all life on the planet. 

Each satellite will emit millimetre waves with an effective radiated power of up to 5 million watts from thousands of antennas arranged in a phased array. Although the energy reaching the ground from satellites will be less than that from ground-based antennas, it will irradiate areas of the Earth not reached by other transmitters and will be additional to ground-based 5G transmissions from billions of IoT objects. Even more importantly, the satellites will be located in the Earth’s magnetosphere, which exerts a significant influence over the electrical properties of the atmosphere including the Schumann Resonance. The alteration of Earth’s electromagnetic environment, especially where Schumann Resonance resides, may be an even greater threat to life than the radiation from ground-based antennas.

The following article is worth the time to read. It contains a lot of information on the Schumann Resonance and the potential catastrophic results of disrupting it along with a call to action to every citizen of the world not buy into 5G at a grass roots levels and actively hold those responsible to account.

http://treeoflifecenterus.com/5g-a-toxic-assault-on-the-planetary-web-of-life/

Dr Martin Pall explains the catastrophic dangers of 5G in this video lecture:

AGAINST THE ARGUMENT THAT 5G AND SMART METERS ARE ‘GREEN’ AND HELPING TO MONITOR AND PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT

Whilst there are many benefits quoted for monitoring the environment and being ‘green’, a few obvious flaws/omissions in this mainstream message include:-

Just from an energy and carbon emission perspective, the data centres alone required to power and store the internet and cloud etc. require massive amounts of power and housing in vast data centres. This does not include the energy required to power the countless billions of power hungry devices projected to connect to the Internet of Things.

Researchers say the data centre sector could be using 20% of all available electricity in the world by 2025 on the back of the large amounts of data being created at a fastest speed than ever before seen and the Internet of things.

https://data-economy.com/data-centres-world-will-consume-1-5-earths-power-2025/

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/11/tsunami-of-data-could-consume-fifth-global-electricity-by-2025

Wildlife is undoubtedly already affected by existing RF radiation frequencies and 5G will be catastrophic. There has already been a decline of c. 80% of insects alone in the last 20 years since the deployment of 2,3 and 4G cell towers. Birds, bees and pollinators are unable to navigate, their small bodies quickly affected and colonies collapse. An environmental and food chain collapse could be the next stage.

https://mdsafetech.org/environmental-and-wildlife-effects/

http://www.sccma-mcms.org/Portals/19/SilentSpringAticle_color_pr2.pdf?fbclid=IwAR37WtA2F7F6ogEHjprTXPZt4iridUOxiiobZ79pvwIq6RxWfUa_m8QPzXU

https://ehtrust.org/published-research-adverse-effect-wireless-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-bees/

Damaging effects of RF radiation on plants and trees are notable and researched

Plant and cell biology is affected in similar ways to humans and other biological creatures:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/search/advanced?qs=non-ionizing+radiation+effects+on+plants&origin=article&zone=qSearch

Conflict minerals include titanium, tin, tungsten and gold, which are used in many electronic components and computer products. The Internet of Things, aiming for every device to have an RF chip connecting to the internet, will only increase pressure on these precious recourses, many of which can only be found in a few locations across the world.

LED Street Lights are being rolled out across the country and other counties across the world on the basis of being a saviour for the environment by using energy saving LED’s and RF transmitting antenna to control them. We have covered the issues relating to LED lampposts and the transmitters in our earlier posts.

Smart Meters being pushed out into homes by government and utility companies also form part of the Internet of Things and the 5G infrastructure grid. These are sold as convenient and ‘energy saving’. There are many reports noting that no energy is saved and/or bills increase. Energy savings still depend on users actually ‘reducing’ usage which can be encouraged regardless of a smart meter display which may be rarely looked at. We covered the pulsed microwave dangers in last weeks post.

Tree Felling – the connection. It is acknowledged by the industry that trees block 5G signals. Trees are being felled across the Wirral, Liverpool, the country, the rail network and the globe at a furious and alarming pace on the pretence of H&S. Wirral and Liverpool Councils are progressing with fellings despite all public objections. Trees are being are felled to clear the way for the 5G signals to pass. Trees that are not felled are significantly harmed by the 5G signals.

http://media.withtank.com/cf9ae35027/waldmann-selsam_2016_scitotenv572p554-569_rf__trees.pdf

An academic UK university study linking to corporate studies below shows how trees affect 5G signals: page 5 acknowledges that the wireless signal is attenuated by trees and page 6 that the higher 5G frequencies are more affected by trees than 4G.

https://www.surrey.ac.uk/sites/default/files/White-Paper-Rural-5G-Vision_0.pdf

If the 20,000 satellites are deployed as planned, just the rocket fuel alone could unleash an environmental catastrophe with the ozone depletion and the release of black soot increasing global warning by several degrees. The satellite’s will also eventually fall and burn releasing dangerous substances across the globe.

https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/01/08/20000-satellites-for-5g-to-be-launched-sending-focused-beams-of-intense-microwave-radiation-over-entire-earth/?fbclid=IwAR03FTQcsgE0vHUvdJq6-bxZg5vXGDZS6v5TSFqMQdyGafgfi3u_S5oNs10

Conclusion: It may be hard to hear with our addiction to smartphones and ‘smart’ tech but existing 2G, 3G and 4G technology along with wifi and wirelesses technology is already having disastrous health and environmental impacts. It is also hard to hear that the government is supporting guidelines that DO NOT protect our health and have allowed things to get this far and are about to unleash much greater exposure on our health and the environment in the form of 5G.

‘Smart’ has been cleverly positioned from a marketing perspective. After all, would you really want to be the only one not to be ‘smart’ and/or to buy something if it were called a ‘microwave emitting, cancer causing spying’ devise? Get Smart….stop buying Smart!!!

Currently, one could at least try and take some measures to try and protect your family and limit exposure by moving further away from a cell tower (if you can still find anywhere) and by switching off your wifi and hardwiring, refusing smart meters, not buying smart tech with RF chips installed and limiting smart phone use to essential calls and texts rather than downloading videos and using every conceivable app. This is especially important around children. Although insects, birds, plants and wildlife do not have this luxury.

5G will be a much stronger and more damaging signal by a factor of c. x100 and will be a global, environmental and health catastrophe and will be inescapable.

This is a UK lecture on wireless, smart meters and 5G presenting a lot of information and evidence. It is over 2 hours long but would be worth watching if you have time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8kU3VXl-kg&t=504s
“5G rollout is absolutely insane”.
Dr. Martin Pall from the Washington State University (WSU)

Over the following weeks we will expose a little more about the Liverpool City Region plans that we have learned about for 5G (we are sure there is much more than we know). We will also look at ways that you can reduce your existing existing RF exposure…but the only way to not be exposed to 5G is to STOP IT. Get active, do your research, spread the information, stand up against the implementation to councils, utilities and telecoms, do not buy into this technology.

Smart Meters – Not so smart!

Smart meter

The latest in our series written by ‘Bright Spark’ which explores existing wireless technology and the planned 5G roll out:

In our previous articles we highlighted the dangers of the new blue/white light emitted from the Council’s new lamppost replacement programme, as well as the extremely dangerous microwave radiating transmitters that are on top of each lamppost that are forming part of the 5G infrastructure grid planned for Liverpool and the Wirral. We then focused on the totally inadequate ‘safety standards’ quoted by the Council, Government and industry for wireless devises and cell towers. The ICNIRP/PHE ‘safety guidelines’ that are used are out-dated and based on the assumption that non-ionising microwave radiation is perfectly safe as long as it does not heat a fluid filled mannequin head up by several degrees over a short few minute exposure!

This week we would like to bring your attention to the dangers of smart meters, another part of the 5G grid and Internet of Things that the Government and Council are supporting. Smart Meters are being pushed by the Government and utility companies under the guise of convenience and helping to save energy. What they are not telling you is the catastrophic health and environmental dangers of this, yet another, microwave emitting spying devise.

If you do not have a smart meter as yet (electricity, gas and water), we urge you do your research and refuse a smart meter at all costs. It is not a legal requirement, despite the pressure that utility companies are putting people under to swap them. If you have one already, it is not easy to request a change back to an analogue meter, but please do your research and, even if you have to fight and pay for the swap, we would urge you to consider this for your health’s sake and that of your family and neighbours.

Smart meters contain two microwave transmitters, one to communicate with the cell towers and the other to scan your home’s devises for usage, monitoring every smart devise as it does so. They utilise ‘pulsed’ microwave frequencies and, if you have a microwave detector, a strong piercing pulse of non-ionising microwaves can be detected every 10 to 20 seconds. Pulsed microwave signals have been shown to be biologically very harmful. Many people have reported feeling unwell, sleeplessness, anxiety, depression, heart changes, decreased cognitive function, sleeplessness, headaches, tinnitus to name a few symptoms soon after the installation of smart meters. Some meters pulse up to 190,000 times per day (essentially constant pulsing). These pulses can travel nearly 2 miles and may conduct along all copper electrical wiring within a home and community. The pulses are then re-radiated into the living environment.

https://www.emfanalysis.com/smart-meter-health-effects/?fbclid=IwAR1dA_7RVnCqo- TuRr6FZrnZG7X3NKwy7WwqN9xjKTFQDuMCK72J1fny4_o

Smart meters, being pushed out into homes by government and utility companies also form part of the Internet of Things and the 5G infrastructure control grid. These are sold as convenient and ‘energy saving’. There are, however, many reports noting that no energy is saved and/or bills increase. Energy savings still depend on users actually ‘reducing’ usage which can be encouraged regardless of a smart meter display which may be rarely looked at.

Smart meters also increase demand on cell towers, increasing the numbers of these monstrosities across our streets next to our homes. Vast amounts of energy is needed to maintain the data in data centres. Eventually, energy may be charged differently for different devises or different times of day. Utility companies will know every movement you make within your own home, know when you are in the bathroom, what time you go to bed, what you watch and know when you are away. There are plans to replace care workers for old and dementia patients with spying smart devises and smart meters will form part of the information collected and sent back to the monitoring centres to monitor their movements…all part of the Councils 5G health plan!!!.

Residents often do not know that smart meters have been installed in close by properties and may therefore unknowingly be affected but still feeling health symptoms. On a large estate or block of flats there could be many hundreds or even thousands of smart meters, each emitting hundreds of thousands of pulses per day along with all the pulses from all of the smart devises they are collecting data from. As the signals travel for many miles and also jump onto electrical wires, everyone will be affected along with pets, surrounding wildlife and insects.

As demonstrated by Daniel Hirsch, Senior Nuclear Policy Lecturer at UCSC, ‘Smart’ Meters can expose the body to 160x to 800x times as much microwave radiation as mobile phones. ‘Smart’ Meters emit intense pulses of radiation in excess of 190,000 times every day. This will massively increase the EMF exposure to members of a household, their neighbours and environment. It has been shown that pulsed frequencies have an especially damaging effect biologically.

https://theecologist.org/2017/apr/11/smart-meters-and-cell-damage-pulsed- em-radiation-our-health-risk

Jerry Flynn is a retired Captain in the Communications Electronics Engineering Branch from the Canadian Armed Forces. He extensively studied radio communications, including radio and antenna theory, the radio frequency spectrum, radar and telephone systems, electronic warfare, signals intelligence, and more. Most of the dangers he clearly explains are the same issues as the UK and it is worth taking the time to review his work which relates to smart meters and wireless in general.

 

https://emfcommunity.com/harmful-effects-smart-meters-cell-phones-wi-fi- jerry-flynn-military-radio-expert/

Mike Mitchen is UK based and has done a lot of research and work to highlight the dangers of smart meters and this video and his work is worth the time to watch.

Smart meters are currently not a legal obligation in the UK and you can insist on a refusal. Do not accept a ‘dumbed down meter’ as this only means that that particular company cannot read it, but it is still trying to establish transmission.

This is a helpful UK site for information on smart meters, their dangers and provides resources and letters you can use to send to your utility company withdrawing implied consent.

http://www.stopsmartmeters.org.uk

There are so many reasons to refuse a smart meter. We would encourage you to do your research and share this information with your family and friends.

In the coming weeks we will focus more on what 5G is. Make no mistake this is planned for Liverpool and the Wirral and the infrastructure is being rolled out with fury in preparation without knowledge or consent from the population. 5G will take wireless radiation exposures and dangers to a whole new level.

 

Wireless Wirral and the Planned 5G Rollout

 

image-6

The test dummy upon which the ICNIRP guidelines are based.

The latest in our debate generating series of posts brought to you by ‘Bright Spark’  :

Over the last two weeks we focused on the new LED lampposts and the unhealthy blue/white LED light and transmitters on top. These posts have hopefully got your attention and got you thinking about the prolific expansion of wireless technology in recent years and the impending ‘Internet of Things’ and the 5G testing in Liverpool and Birkenhead with the rest of the Wirral 5G enabled and ready to turn on. Whilst wireless technology is very convenient, it is very inconveniently unsafe, period.

There is no safe level of microwave radiation (Barry Trower).

Existing EMF (electromagnetic frequency) smog created by wireless technology (2G, 3G, 4G, 4G LTE, cell towers, wifi, smart meters, Bluetooth, cordless DECT phones, wireless sensors, baby monitors, Sky Q boxes, Echo, smartphones, tablets, laptops, smart TV’s, games consoles, all manner of smart tech and remote controlled devises, driver assisted cars etc.) and now 5G (which will lay the infrastructure to blanket every inch of the country and globe with millimetre waves c.100 times stronger than current levels for even faster download speeds, driverless cars, delivery drones, virtual reality, facial recognition, AI and other, as yet, inconceivable technologies) have already/are being rolled out in the Wirral, UK and across the world and positioned as safe, environmentally friendly and essential for every area of the economy.

When being sold the conveniences of wireless technology (instead of the more inconvenient and expensive hardwiring), or being sucked in by the lure of the promises of 5G to provide even faster download speeds and improve your life so you can download a video in 6 seconds instead of 7 minutes; have a driverless car, live in a virtual reality; sit on the couch whilst turning your lights and washing machine on and ordering your dinner to come by drone delivery; live in smart cities controlled by facial recognition and enjoy being connected to billions of other devises via the Internet of Things (IoT) and controlled by the cloud…you may want to look at the human and environmental health risks that have already occurred at current levels. In a future post we will focus on the exponential dangers of 5G which will use both existing microwave bands as well as new millimetre waves and utilises a different beam forming technology.

Is it worth your health and that of your children, grandchildren and the destruction of the environment to carry on accepting this as ‘progress’? We have all been complicit in inviting this technology into our homes and children’s lives and it is now down to each and every one of us now to reconsider our priorities.
The issue with government and industry guidelines and PHE/ICNIRP guidelines is this:-

The International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation (AGNIR), which Public Health England (PHE), government departments and industry steadfastly quote, maintain that there is no ‘convincing evidence’ or that ‘it does not appear’ that exposure to radio frequencies below ‘guidelines’ poses any risk.

These PHE/ICNIRP guidelines have not been updated since 1998 before wireless technology had been prolifically rolled out and are based SOLELY on ‘thermal’ (i.e. heating effects) over a short (c. 6 minute) exposure on a fluid filled test dummy (see above). They are based on the out-dated belief that only acute thermal effects are hazardous and that non-ionising radiation does not have enough power to affect DNA as ionising (nuclear) radiation does. They steadfastly maintain that there is no issue whatsoever with non-ionising radiation except a potential heating effect at high enough power densities (e.g. your microwave oven heats you up but your wifi is miraculously safe at a lower power, both of which operate on 2.4 GHz spectrum).

These guidelines DO NOT take any of the following into account:-

The non-thermal effects of RF radiation. These effects take place at levels way below recommended guidelines.
Any effects on actual cell biology, cell membranes, mitochondria and DNA etc.
The effects of multiple frequency exposure
The effects of ‘pulsed’ frequency exposure
The cumulative effect of 24/7 exposure
The addition of multiple RF emitting sources in one location
The effects on wildlife, trees, plants, birds, bees, pollinators, bacteria and viruses etc. on their biology and navigation etc.
The effects on infants, children, foetus and vulnerable groups

This link shows the fluid filled test dummy that has no biology upon which all so called ‘safety standards’ are based.
https://ehtrust.org/sar-test-inadequate/

The International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) exposure level is approx. 900 quadrillion times higher than natural background microwave radiation levels (0.000.000.000.010 µW/m²).

The current guidelines DO NOT PROVE that exposure to RF radiation is ‘safe’. They only state that there is no evidence to ‘suggest’ that it is not safe and are not considering the growing body of evidence and calls from scientists all around the world that demonstrate that it is most definitely not safe at levels way below these guidelines.

No ‘body’ is even measuring exposure levels or ‘combined’ exposure levels from cell towers, devises sold into homes and therefore combined in any location even against the glaringly inadequate guidelines. Big Telecoms and Big Wireless is rolling out unchecked and with impunity.

Damage from RF exposure is uninsurable. The Government, utility companies, big telecoms and smart tech industries may be turning a blind eye to the dangers of wireless radiation exposure but the insurance business has not. Lloyd’s of London sets the standard for the world and has a clause that excludes any compensation for claims: “directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electro-magnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.” Radio waves are explicitly included as they, specifically the microwave zone, are what enable wireless communications devices like cell phones, wi-fi, cordless phones etc. So RFs are invalidating insurance policies.
http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/lloyds-of-london-excludes-liability-coverage-for-harm-from-wireless-radiationrf-emf/

Whilst there are undoubtedly many benefits and conveniences of wireless technology, it is also clear that TRILLIONS OF £ & $ are at stake as well as geopolitical agendas that choose to ignore the dangers. The fact is there are thousands of research papers and calls from credible research scientists across the world that conclude that the current ‘safety standards’ are woefully inadequate and that the roll out of 5G will exacerbate the current issues exponentially. These are simply being ignored by industry/governments/councils and/or discredited by industry sponsored research.

A few examples that are being ignored:

On 31st May 2011, the World Health Organisation’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) categorised RF EMFs as a possible CARCINOGEN (Class 2b) – the same category as lead, DDT, chloroform & methylmercury. There are calls to upgrade this to a Group 1 (definitive) carcinogen.

Below is a recent commentary by Prof. Lennart Hardell on the findings of a $25mn US NTP study into cell phone signals.  His conclusion is unequivocal:

Based on the IARC preamble to the monographs, RF radiation should be classified as Group 1: The agent is carcinogenic to humans.
’This category is used when there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. Exceptionally, an agent may be placed in this category when evidence of carcinogenicity in humans is less than sufficient but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals and strong evidence in exposed humans that the agent acts through a relevant mechanism of carcinogenicity.’ (http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Preamble/currentb6evalrationale0706.php)

Hardell’s work led to the category of 2B back in 2011, he now is calling for it to be upgraded to Class 1.

https://ehtrust.org/cancer-expert-declares-cell-phone-wireless-radiation-carcinogenic-humans/
On 6th May 2011, the Council of Europe issued a report titled “Potential dangers of EMFs and their effect on the environment” in which they called for an IMMEDIATE reduction in exposure to EMFs by children. The Council advocates a precautionary principle be applied to wireless emissions to prevent public health disaster akin to “tobacco, leaded petrol and asbestos”.

See the Bioinitiative Report 2012. This is informative and gives a clear statement of the problem and a lot references http://www.bioinitiative.org.

Martin Pall, PhD (Caltech, 1968) Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences Washington State University. Below are some links to his extensive research and letter to California legislators:

https://peaceinspace.blogs.com/files/5g-emf-hazards–dr-martin-l.-pall–eu-emf2018-6-11us3.pdf

https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Pall-Letter-to-CalLegis-FINAL-8-7-17.pdf

Other references throughout this note contain many credible and peer reviewed studies of evidence of harm that are being ignore/dismissed in favour of government/industry objectives.

Health Effects of RF Radiation and Biological Mechanisms:-

Symptoms of RF (radiofrequency) radiation exposure are many and many of these conditions have increased exponentially in the last 10-20 years since the advent of wireless technology, cell towers, wifi and EMF exposure etc. One has to wonder why there is no other viable explanation that has been shown for these huge increases in conditions that co-inside with this timeline. Doctors are not recognising (or not allowed to recognise the connection).

Some of these health effects include:-

Sleep problems, fatigue, learning and concentration problems, stress, anxiety, depression, headaches, tinnitus, heart problems, palpitations, arrhythmias, cramps, nausea, nosebleeds, hormone disruption, fertility problems, ADHD, autism and neurological and sensory spectrum disorders, immune system disorders, respiratory problems, diabetes, skin rashes and flushes, dementia, alzheimers and cancer. These are known radiation sicknesses.

https://www.radiationhealthrisks.com/21-health-symptoms-rf-radiation/

https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/library/downloads/pf-emfs-9-heart-dementia-2018-11.pdf

There is also alot of information and references on the dangers of wireless radiation on the following links:-

https://ehtrust.org.
https://ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/

Basic biology is clear in that every cell and nerve in the body operates using minute electrical signals. There can be no doubt that these biological signals will be affected by exposure to unnatural and continuous high frequency microwave radiation at billions of cycles per second.

Wifi, for example, operates at 2.4 Ghz (2.4 billion cycles per second) and so too does your microwave oven! Although the power density is less, how does a microwave oven on a stick in your home suddenly become safe? In short, it does not. It might not heat you up by 2 degrees in 6 minutes but any logic would tell you this is not safe 24/7.

5G is set to use various higher military grade millimetre wave frequencies e.g. 60Ghz (60 billion cycles per second) and 125 Ghz (125 billion cycles per second) which have been auctioned off already at huge profit to governments all over the world. High-frequency 60GHz 5G has already been shown to interfere with the oxygen molecules we breathe amongst many other serious metabolic issues.

The actual biological mechanisms by which these illnesses manifest are many and complex and too many to note in details this paper but research includes:-

Changes in DNA and mitochondria, changes in cellular process, damage to voltage gated ion channels leading to electrical signal changes in the cell, changes in brain waves and neuron responses, oxidative stress, cell inflammation and damage to the blood/brain permeability.

https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/library/downloads/pf-emfs-4-cells-mechanisms-2018-11.pdf

https://ehtrust.org/science/recent-scientific-publications-by-the-eht-scientific-team/

Dr Martin Palls work, papers and lectures explain clearly the mechanisms of harm as well as how children, insects and trees are particularly affected. His predictions are dire and should urgently be heeded but are ignored by government and industry:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsaB7ewFsN0&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR2zSxxJflxoT-9IReJKGnVJSHCTbvTB-ilb3dZLKI0II67TMbRm4vdxCCg
https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Pall-Letter-to-CalLegis-FINAL-8-7-17.pdf

Contrary to ICNIRP, PHE and Government guidelines, it is quite evident that there is considerable scientific doubt of the safety of these EU, UK guidelines and standards.

Anecdotally, many people are becoming sick with many conditions noted above but with ‘unknown cause’ and for others, lives have become a misery with Electro Sensitivity. It is estimated that Elecro Sensitivity will increase from the current estimate of 3-10% to 50% in the coming years. Peoples health and the environment is being damaged whether they are ‘electrically sensitive’ and aware of it or not.

http://www.es-uk.info/

These connections are simply dismissed by government and NHS doctors. Living close to unavoidable sources and being forcibly exposed to RF radiation is a real misery for many people. Many people are acutely aware of the cause of their illness or discomfort, often living close to a cell tower or becoming sensitive after being exposed to Wifi all day in work, school or home or recently having a smart meter installed and others remain unaware of the cause getting medical treatments that will not help.

A recent article in the Lancet outlines concerns of harm from conception that has now occurred and increased rapidly in the past 20 years. Amongst other issues, it outlines evidence of the effects of exposure to wireless devices on the CNS, including altered neurodevelopment, increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases, behavioural disorders and structural and functional changes in the brain associated with ADHD-like behaviour in children.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext?dgcid=raven_jbs_etoc_email&fbclid=IwAR1s3PagJHpPbQjkb2jhRvCGrdJwL877rIXQQRr70GdaSIBmCquPBi7QaH0

At a time when environmental health scientists tackle serious global issues such as climate change and chemical toxicants in public health, it calls for an urgent need to address so-called electrosmog.

The current guidelines are simply irrelevant to continuous exposure:

http://www.es-uk.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/03.4-Importance-of-Biological-not-Heating-Guidelines.pdf

Please refer to the Bioinitiative report and the Building Biology Levels precautionary guidelines for RF/Microwave exposure which take non thermal effects into account:

http://www.bioinitiative.org
http://www.slt.co/Downloads/Education/EMF-Exposure-Guidelines-For-Sleeping-Areas.pdf
http://www.emfwise.com/emf-safety-standards.php
http://www.emfwise.com/tableofeffects.php

The conversion and the various measuring units are very complex and it is easy to understand how invested interests can persuade government and decision makers into believing inadequate safety measures.

In summary, however, by comparison, the EU standard being used to determine ‘safety’ is thousands of times higher than the levels shown to cause cellular damage and health issues and the precautionary levels advised by building biology guidelines. In nature, levels are almost undetectable which is a clear measure of the real level at which biology operates at a healthy level:-

EU Safety Standard: 1 mW/cm2 (= 61.4 V/m)

Nature: <0.00002 V/m

Building Biology No Concern: < 0.006 V/m
Building Biology Slight Concern: 0.006-0.06 V/m
Building Biology Severe Concern: 0.06-0.6 V/m
Building Biology Extreme Concern: >0.6 V/m

To reiterate, the ‘EU/UK safety standards’ are thousands of times higher than biological safety standards and only measure SAR (thermal) effects performed on a fluid filled dummy. They do not take ANY account of non thermal effects, continuous exposure, pulsed frequency exposure, multiple frequency range exposure etc. to the actual biology of any creature large or small. No one is measuring the combined exposure effect in an average home e.g living next to a cell tower, 3 smart meters, wifi, plus neighbours smart meters and wifi, combined with the vast array of wireless devises. No one is measuring effects on wildlife, plant health and the decline of insects, pollinators and birds. Insect populations have plummeted dramatically in the last 10 years and this correlates with the introduction of 3 and 4G, smart meters and smart LED lamp posts.

There are simply thousands of peer reviewed studies linking RF radiation exposure to cancer and many of the illnesses above and yet these studies, along with the classification of the WHO are being ignored. The government/industry is rolling out ever increasing wireless infrastructure including masts for full UK 4GLTE coverage and is now laying the foundations for the 5G infrastructure and smart cities (including allowing existing masts to be upgraded to 5G, new 5G upgradable masts, LED lampposts with RF transmitters, and any number of street furniture such as manholes and telephone boxes as well as (the insane) space satellites planned to augment the coverage). Industry, with an eye on ‘the internet of things’ is selling every conceivable devise loaded with RF transmitters, that in most cases cannot be disabled, to the unsuspecting and technology enraptured public.

There is so much evidence of harm that is being ignored in favour of the industry/government interests. It is an extremely inconvenient truth that this technology is not safe and action must be taken to STOP THE ROLL OUT OF 5G and limit the use of existing wireless technology.
Most of the public are unaware of the dangers as they are not being informed of these dangers by the mainstream media or may simply not believe that the government would knowingly allow this to happen (refer tobacco, diesel, asbestos, GMO’s, fracking, pesticides etc!). This is a global experiment without informed consent. RF radiation cannot be seen, heard or perceived. Those that are aware and/or sensitive are horrified at the complicity of the government and councils in allowing this crime against humanity.

It should be the duty of the council and the government to act in the best interests of the environment and the health of the public and this is currently not the case. The future liability for complicity in the irreversible harm to human health and the environment must surely rest with the council, government and government advisory bodies as well as industry with whom they work hand in hand. They need to immediately acknowledge the scientific evidence and amend the government policies proliferating the infrastructure roll out and industry sales of RF devices. Unfortunately, this does not look like it will happen any time soon and may already be too late for the health of many.

To make any changes millions of voices and careful individual purchasing changes are required. Do not assume someone else will take action.

LED Lampposts – What Wirral Council isn’t telling you … (Part 2)

P1010768

Our latest correspondent ‘Bright Spark’ has apologised for any upset caused by their last post that we published. Needless to say we at Wirral Leaks say bring it on – we’ll take the brickbats with the bouquets. These posts are about information sharing ,to raise awareness and to stimulate debate and discussion. The last post  Light Emitting Diodes – What Wirral Council isn’t telling you…   did just that and we look forward to publishing further instalments :

Last week we focused on the blue/white LED lights in the new lampposts that Wirral Council (and most other councils across the UK and world) are now rapidly rolling out and the harm that this light wave spectrum generates for human, wildlife and insect circadian rhythms and hormone production.

This week we will shine the spotlight on the Uninode transmitters which are positioned on the top of the new lampposts and which have been innocently positioned by the Council as a ‘lighting control system’ which are green and save us energy by dimming the lights. If informed of the real purpose, perhaps any support for the potential energy ‘saving’ might be much outweighed by the very real dangers of further increasing our RF (radio frequency i.e. microwave frequency) exposure with a web of inescapable transmitters positioned on every street and outside children’s bedrooms.

Most people have not even noticed the transmitters yet (and are therefore uninformed by the Council), let alone questioned what they are really for. Certainly the Council and Government are keen to roll them out under cover of this lamppost upgrade. Co-incidentally this is in advance of 5G and our ‘digital economy’ with millions being spent to do so.

In our following articles over the next few weeks, we will focus on the health dangers of current wireless radiation exposure, and some of the common sources, which has already increased 118 (i.e. 18,000,000,000,000) times in the last few decades (1) before coming onto the exponential dangers of the new 5G technology of which these transmitters undoubtedly form a part. If you are not already concerned about 5G yet you should be as this is already planned for Liverpool and Birkenhead this year (2) and it is clear that the rest of the Wirral is next with this and other infrastructure rapidly being deployed.

Currently these Uninodes advise that they operate on 868-870 MHz frequency (which falls in the microwave RF spectrum). They are also on continuous transmission. So this is, at the very least, similar to having a mobile phone or stronger spewing out microwave radiation on at all times. This will lead to a further significant increase in the RF microwave smog that the Wirral, and indeed most other areas of the country, are now being exposed to without knowledge or understanding of the dangers and without consent.

The following is extracted from the Harvard Technology ‘Conformance of radio comms equipment relating to human exposure’ document (3):

Harvard LeafNut Radio equipment communicates at very low RF power levels in the 868-870MHz band. From fixed position several meters from human contact, the effective radiated power has been measured between 11-14dBm or 12.5-25mW for 100% continuous transmission. According to the standard this equates to a power density of only 0.007mW/cm2. Safe exposure limits set by this standard are 1mW/ cm2 . This can therefore be deemed in compliance.

Before we go any further, the issue with ‘safety standards’ that industry, Councils, Government and Public Health England quote are based on thermal (heating effects) only of RF / non ionising radiation. They effectively test a fluid filled dummy head (yes you heard that right…a fluid filled dummy head) next to a device for a short exposure (c. 6 minutes) and if the fluid does not heat up by 2 degrees or so, it is declared safe or in compliance. Incredible as that might sound, it is true and this has been and continues to be the basic upon which all wireless radiation devices (cell phones, wifi, baby monitors, DECT phones, smart products, smart meters, cell towers etc.) are deemed safe (4). In fact when you read any response back from the Council or Government regarding safety of RF radiation, they quote these The International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines and conclude there is ‘no evidence to suggest harm’ at these levels. This does NOT prove it is safe, it means it meets inadequate safety testing which has not been updated since 1998 before the massive explosion of wireless technology. Many credible scientists are saying that these standards are out by a factor of many thousands if not millions for true biological safety.

This so called ‘safety standard’ in the UK does not take into account ANY effect whatsoever on human health, children, embryos in the womb, insects, animals or plant cell biology, nor does it take any account any effect of continuous low level exposure, pulsed frequency exposure or multiple frequency exposure. You will not find any research that proves microwaves biological safety. The guidelines only ‘suggest’ safety….of course based on a short exposure thermal test only! Public Health England (PHE), the Government, Council and Industry take advise from the ICNIRP which sets industry standards for exposure…who sits on this body one has to wonder. In fact the self-appointed ICNIRP seem in the process of relaxing standards in advance of the 5G roll out (5).

We are now totally blanketed by millions and millions of times natural background radiation by every manner of wireless devise and cell towers and now by this ominous, inescapable network of 5G ready lamppost transmitters. It raises very serious questions about human and environmental safety as well as informed consent to forcible exposure (allegedly safe or otherwise). There is no informed choice to being exposed.

4G cell towers are now also being 5G ready enabled and the lamppost transmitters are being connected up via the boxes next to them in preparation. This is happening now. This will enable the Uninode transmitters to be 5G upgraded (if they are not already). 4G or 5G they are still transmitting microwave radiation into every area of our environment.

What they mean by ‘several meters’ from source is unclear but ‘several meters from source’ easily reaches into a bedroom window where a child is asleep for 8 hours and certainly those poor birds that are seen perched on them are exposed at source, which by any safety measure if unsafe. Flying insects and pollinators are attracted to the lights and also find difficultly navigating in the web of electromagnetic radiation as they operate on very subtle electromagnetic signals plus are more quickly affected by their small size. There is no safe ‘distance from source’ for them. This is devastating our insect and small bird populations as it is inescapable (see reference 6 for some examples of how insects and wildlife are affected). The reach of each transmitter is up to 8 km so every person and every creature is being exposed to many thousands of signals at any one time.

IMG_0819

These lampposts are now being connected up via 5G ready cell towers (many new ones of which are rapidly appearing across the Wirral) via Ethernet. Although the Council is currently deigning this is 5G, they are certainly upgradable to 5G frequencies and phased array antennae. We will focus on 5G in a future article, but 5G does not travel well through obstacles (such as trees) and therefore requires to be positioned at least every 2-10 houses or so. All manner of ‘street furniture’ such as lampposts, manholes, phone boxes, church spires etc. will be used to house the transmitters.

If you feel uncomfortable or sick with the current levels of cell towers, wifi and wireless radiation exposure, 5G will be up to 10-100 times stronger and will be inescapable. Imagine a world of driverless cars, drones, facial recognition and robotic controls, the signal cannot fail and must be positioned everywhere.

Basic biology is clear in that every cell and nerve in the body operates using tiny electrical signals. There can surely be no logical doubt that these biological signals will be affected by pulsed or continuous high frequency microwave radiation of billions of cycles per second. For example, your microwave operates using 2.4 GHz (2.4 billions cycles per minute) to excite the water molecules in the food. Wifi operates on 2.4 GHz (although the new wifi’s are operating on 5GHz which is even stronger). Miraculously, when it is on a lower power (such that it does not heat you up by several degrees in a few minutes several meters from source), according to ‘safety standards’ it is perfectly safe! Hey presto! Voila! Magic!

There are, in fact, thousands of papers and calls from credible research scientists across the world that conclude that the current ‘safety standards’ are woefully inadequate (see reference 7 for just a few examples). Biological effects take place at levels far far below thermal levels. We will focus on current wireless radiation exposure health issues in future articles to build up an understanding before focusing on the exponential dangers of 5G about to explode onto our streets. 5G is being sold with wonderful benefits of faster download speeds, economic miracles, instant gaming, virtual reality, driverless cars, drones, AI and the Internet of Things….the downside…turning our environment into a microwave oven….amazingly all with no health impacts whatsoever…and incredible profits!!!

Even the World Health Organisation has in fact classified wireless high frequency radiation as a ‘Group 2B probable carcinogen’ and there are calls to upgrade this to a Group 1 (definitive) carcinogen. And yet, the UK Government and Wirral Council continue with the deployment of this network of transmitters and 5G plans.

It is clear that there is considerable scientific doubt as to the safety of these EU, UK guidelines and standards. Even if just some of it is true, a precautionary approach should be adopted immediately. Scientists all over the world are calling for a halt to 5G which is being ignored (8). We are in the midst of an uninformed and unconsented experiment on our health and that of all future generations.

When challenged, it is clear no safety testing whatsoever on the environmental and/or health impact has been undertaken by Wirral Council or the Government to actual biology of any group (males, females, foetuses, babies, children, wildlife, insects, birds etc. ) potentially now for a lifetime before the deployment of these Uninodes (and other 5G infrastructure) on the Wirral. Sorry…our mistake….of course it is perfectly safe, it meets ICNIRP guidelines that show each device does not heat you up by a few degrees over a short exposure!

In the Council’s Street Lighting ‘Strategy and Action Plan 2014’ (9) extracted are the following quotes:-

The Local Government Act 1966, means that Wirral Council is a Highway Authority in its own right with a duty to ensure the safety of the public highway.
“Wirral will be a place where the vulnerable are safe and protected, where employers want to invest and local businesses thrive, and where good health and an excellent quality of life is within the reach of everyone who lives here”
In delivering a new street lighting approach the Council will aim to:
Act in the best interests of the customer and the Council at all times; Have consideration for the natural and built environments;

You cannot see it, feel it or touch it, but RF radiation via the Central Management System (CMS) and Uninode PhotoCell technology (or any other transmitting devises currently or yet to be deployed) most certainly does not ensure the safety of the public, nor ensure good health, nor protect the vulnerable, nor provides an excellent quality of life, nor consideration for the natural environment. Health is damaged, cancer and neurological problems etc. increase and wildlife is collapsing. There are thousands of studies proving this that are being ignored or discredited by big industry and misleading the government in favour of corporate interests.

Damage from RF radiation is in fact uninsurable by Lloyds of London. This must say something (10).

It needs no reminding that corporate and government interests/targets have been put ahead many times of the evidence and health of the population and wildlife with little comeback on industry/government in later years after harm has incurred e.g. smoking, asbestos, lead petrol, lead paint, x-ray exposure limits, diesel cars, DEET, alicarb and other toxic pesticides, sugar, hydrogenated fats etc. to name a few. These bans and policy changes have come many decades after the initial warnings and evidence. The pattern is the same, denial, discrediting and finally, after countless deaths and lawsuits, admission and eventually, too late for many, a change of policy.

P1010790

Finally, if for example, people wish to continue smoking that is their choice now, warnings are finally widespread and clear and smoking is banned from public places and schools. It can also be smelt, seen and avoided. There is no safe limit that can ever reasonably ever be set for smoking from adults to babies. It is a matter of luck if disease, from asthma to cancer, does not manifest. Equally, there is no safe limit to high frequency RF microwave exposure. Unlike smoke, it cannot be seen, felt or smelt, passes through walls and concrete. It is now being broadcast from countless cell towers, soon every street lamppost and all manner of wireless devises that are being pushed out by government (smartmeters) and industry (smarttech and IoT’s). It is therefore absolutely impossible to avoid and the effects are real and cumulative and will manifest over a period of time, and in all liklihood far more quickly with 5G. This is being forced on the population without knowledge, any understanding of the effects or consent. Just because something is technologically possible does not make it safe. The 5G testbeds only prove massive speeds and penetration through buildings etc. they are not testing safety. Just because this is not reported in the industry sponsored mainstream media does not make it untrue.

Even if people or creatures survive the next 20 years before acceptance of harm, DNA will be damaged for generations to come. There is no reversing damaged DNA in humans, eggs, sperm and all living creatures. There is no going back once pollinators have completely collapsed. Of course there are other factors such as pesticides in insect decline but the collapse of insect population is so rapid over the past 10-20 years since the rapid deployment of 2,3 and 4G and wireless technology. Microwaves cannot be seen, felt or touched. Via oxidative damage mechanisms any range of disease can manifest including neurological problems, depression, mental illness, reproductive harm, autism, ADHD, heart arrhythmias, infertility and cancer etc. All of these have increased rapidly in the past 10-15 years. Exposure can generally only be understood with a meter and measurement is very complex so the public is totally unaware of this source of harm and it is difficult to prove which devise it is as it is everywhere….perfect…no comeback! Forced microwave exposure is already significant coming into our homes, towns and public places, 5G is set to increase this massively. The standards being adhered to and quoted by the EU/UK and industry are simply inadequate.

Exposure without consent into our homes from microwave devices fitted to lampposts as well as cell towers to support them are causing grievous bodily harm and they cannot be escaped from as they pass through walls, windows and travel for many miles.

Whilst there may be some merit in the perceived cost savings and carbon reduction of using LED’s and a wireless Central Management System instead of sodium lights and a cabled system and/or manual inspections surely any benefits are far outweighed by this invisible environmental pollution assault filling our environment with ever increasing and uncontrolled levels of DNA / cell damaging high frequency microwave exposure. It must also be noted that many of these LED lights have been seen on in the day hence their effectiveness/purpose as an effective control system is questionable in this regard. The 5G element is even more ominous. Before you marvel at the prospect of faster download speeds, you may want to consider the health impact of 5G in your health and that of your children and the environment.

5G signals do not travel well through trees and foliage. It seems very co-incidental that trees are being felled at a rapid rate across the Wirral as the lampposts and new cell towers roll out across the Wirral, UK and across the rail networks in the interests of protecting out Health and Safety. Given that the chances of being killed by a tree are half that of being killed by lightening but cancer rates are now 1 in 2, autism 1 in 50 and depression and anxiety rife at 1 in 4, it seems that the H&S focus of protecting us by felling trees is a little spurious at best.

The strategy paper ‘Strategy and Action Plan 2014’ also noted that there are safer alternatives to remotely controlling lampposts (if that were their true intention only) that were considered and dismissed such as underground cabling and inspections. Surely, the cost of a few people’s cancer treatment and illnesses will pay for the cabling and manual inspections, albeit from a different government budget line or target. We believe that the public would choose health and overall environmental impact over cost savings if they were in full possession of the facts.

There is no safe level of exposure to microwave radiation. Period. Microwave radiation is found in nature in almost undetectable levels. Microwave radiation has been classified as a Group 2b carcinogen by the WHO and there are calls to upgrade that classification to a Group 1 carcinogen. The public should be able to walk down their streets, around their home, garden, town and public places without being unknowingly and/or unwillingly exposed to any/let alone continually increasing levels of microwave radiation for the sake of cost savings, government targets, ‘progress’, or the push for the digital and smart economy, 5G and ‘internet of things’.

Recently in the news, there has been talk around the Clean Air Act with children at risk and deserving to breath clean air to stop pollution related deaths. Although microwaves cannot be seen they are a significant health and air/environmental pollutant. We all should have the right to clean air and a clean environment. The government also a few days ago announced a commitment to biodiversity and the environment. Filling the land with RF radiation is not compatible with this pledge.

Do you consent to you and your family being forcibly exposed to these microwave transmitting devises on every lamppost in your home, garden, street or public places? This is an assault on our right to live peacefully in our own homes and should be classified an act of grievous bodily harm if non consensual.

A recent letter (dated March 2018) signed by Cllr Phil Davies, Leader of Wirral Council stated that 2018 priorities were:-

Making sure children are safe, protected and able to reach their full potential.
Investing to improve the quality of our roads and highways.
Expanding our zero-tolerence approach to anti-social behaviour and working with Police to make sure Wirral remains a safe place to live and work.

These Uninode transmitters DO NOT protect children (they harm them), they are an environmental hazard on our roads and are an act of grievous bodily harm and therefore to not provide a safe place to live and work.

An recent article in the Wirral Globe quotes (11):
Councillor Phil Davies who said: “My recommendation will propose all of Wirral’s more than 27,000 street lamps, illuminated bollards and other road safety features across Wirral are improved over the next three years – with 9,000 street lights repaired and replaced in 2018 alone.”
“This investment by my administration would mean every street light in Wirral, from major highways to country lanes and cul-de-sacs, will be replaced with a high-tech, energy efficient LED bulb.”
“This is the single largest investment in our street lighting and road safety for ten years.”
“Following a long-running campaign lead by Cllr Stuart Whittingham, cabinet member for transport, we are delighted to have secured £4.6m of funding from SALIX to provide 27,000 new lamps with remote control dimmers and switches.”

Perhaps these Council and Cabinet leaders will one day be held responsible for any and all future harm caused by RF transmissions from these lampposts and 5G transmitters they have personally endorsed and forced upon us..

Please do not dismiss this information without due research. If you do not consent to being forcibly microwaved in your own home, garden, street and workplace, ensure that your voice is heard by the Council and industry. DO NOT purchase a 5G enabled phone, car or devise, check every new electronic purchase carefully. Do not assume that someone else will do this or that the Council will suddenly acknowledge the dangers and change policy. Only sufficient public research and outcry has a chance of doing that. We are all in awe of faster mobile speeds, glued to our phones and smart devices, perhaps it is time to urgently reconsider our priorities.

If you are in any doubt after reading this article about the severity of this health situation in regards to lamppost transmitters and 5G, please consider signing the two appeals below and sharing with everyone you know.

https://www.change.org/p/wirral-borough-council-stop-5g-roll-out-across-wirral-7699ab72-8dd1-4e73-a8d5-2a5ac834e3d8



https://www.change.org/p/liverpool-city-council-stop-5g-rollout-merseyside-b20cd939-e4f6-4691-9432-a3eb392d1578?recruiter=268591111&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition

Some references:

(1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7R4gKs8ViI

(2) https://mediacentre.vodafone.co.uk/news/5g-in-19-cities-during-2019/?fbclid=IwAR2SCHMzH1VVAiOjWqIScBQui2tWMRWY3QV7FheTHjwnKZDoS9kIc8AgfbQ

(3) Uninode literature attached. Harvard technology seem to have gone into administration and links no longer work. Other companies will be tendering if not already appointed.

(4) https://ehtrust.org/sar-test-inadequate/

(5) https://www.smombiegate.org/icnirp-a-private-unelected-body-defines-future-of-cancerous-5g-for-world/?fbclid=IwAR3J91Rx6pTBM2MnGm4gvUKwSSSfMizfhxvD8zSHAPvEKGNXF7y6hsVpqPE

(6) https://mdsafetech.org/environmental-and-wildlife-effects/

http://www.sccma-mcms.org/Portals/19/SilentSpringAticle_color_pr2.pdf?fbclid=IwAR37WtA2F7F6ogEHjprTXPZt4iridUOxiiobZ79pvwIq6RxWfUa_m8QPzXU

https://ehtrust.org/published-research-adverse-effect-wireless-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-bees/

(7) http://www.bioinitiative.org

https://ehtrust.org.

https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/EU-EMF2018-6-11US3.pdf

A few other references and articles (there are many many more):

https://www.smombiegate.org/4g-5g-frequency-danger-stop-new-mobile-phone-masts-going-up-near-you/

https://ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/

https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/EU-EMF2018-6-11US3.pdf

http://treeoflifecenterus.com/5g-a-toxic-assault-on-the-planetary-web-of-life/

https://thecontrail.com/m/blogpost?id=4744723%3ABlogPost%3A911113&fbclid=IwAR0wxNAMdRfPD8asSAYKAm3pKz-TBdpKNp1xMDKuRusbYMpa6HQYQdQDBj0

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext?dgcid=raven_jbs_etoc_email&fbclid=IwAR1s3PagJHpPbQjkb2jhRvCGrdJwL877rIXQQRr70GdaSIBmCquPBi7QaH0