Radiant Health

The latest from ‘Bright Spark’ concerns about existing wireless technology, the planned 5G roll out and how to reduce your exposure to high frequency radiation…

5G latest

This week we would like to share some tips on how to reduce your exposure to current levels of RF radiation to protect your friends and family. We sincerely hope that you will continue to research this topic and take measures to both reduce levels in your own life, reduce wireless technology usage and stand up against the imminent and even more dangerous 5G roll out.

It is currently almost impossible to avoid high frequency RF microwave radiation thanks to the inadequate ‘safety guidelines’ that the entire industry has been allowed to roll out against along with the almost entire UK coverage of 2G, 3G & 4G as well as WiFi in nearly every home and public place. Forced and unconsented exposure has also increased dramatically with the ill-conceived roll out of smart meters and LED lampposts (see previous posts for further information).

Hopefully, one day sooner rather than later (if we all wake up before it is too late) we will have WiFi ‘free’ (instead of free WiFi) homes, schools, workplaces, café’s and public transport etc. once people finally realise the catastrophic harm that this wireless technology has already done to our health and that of our children and the environment. Using your phone, laptop or tech wirelessly will hopefully, one day, be akin to the now shocking prospect of a teacher lighting up a cigarette in the classroom or people smoking in trains, planes, and public places or in their children’s bedroom. Yet, we happily invite DNA altering, cancer causing, neurologically damaging non-ionising radiation into every area of our home and public place to power our wireless technology. Perhaps we would not have done so had the government and industry told the truth about the damage this would cause. Perhaps life would not fall apart if we rejected wireless technology, in the same way that it did not when the smoking ban in public places finally came into force, which should have been done many years prior and immediately once the dangers were known. Unlike smoking, wireless radiation cannot be seen, smelt or felt and trespasses through walls and windows. Exposure is insidious and unavoidable.

It may be hard to hear with our addiction to smartphones, ‘smart’ tech and wirelesses technology but this is already having disastrous health and environmental impacts. ‘Smart’ has been cleverly positioned from a marketing perspective. After all, would you really want to be the only one not to be ‘smart’ and/or to buy something if it were called a ‘microwave emitting, cancer causing spying’ device?

Currently, one can at least try and take some measures to protect your family by limiting wireless usage, switching off your WiFi and hardwiring, refusing smart meters, not buying smart tech with RF chips installed and limiting smart phone use to essential calls and texts rather than downloading videos and using every conceivable app. This is especially important around children. Although insects, birds, plants and wildlife do not have this luxury. Insects with their small body weights to surface area ratio are not capable of withstanding the current levels of non-ionising radiation. Their numbers have declined dramatically in the last 10-15 years since the introduction of 2G etc. and WiFi. Without insects there will be no life…period. How much more risk are we prepared to accept for faster download speeds, driverless cars and for the industry to make insane profits at everyone’s expense. Tech leaders in Silicone Valley do not allow their children to be exposed to WiFi, ipad’s and smartphones….we wonder why?!

5G will be a much stronger and more damaging signal by a factor of c. x100 and will be a global, environmental and health catastrophe and it will be inescapable with small cells placed on lampposts and every 2-10 houses. The ONLY WAY to protect against 5G is to STOP IT being rolled out and under no circumstances buy into a 5G enabled smart phone, car or any supporting technology.

Please see previous posts for links to supporting evidence and studies of harm of RF radiation, especially the work of Dr Martin Pall.

Please spread this information and take action in your own area of control. Do not accept smart meters or 5G in your area. Encourage your friends, neighbours and loved ones to do the same.

Some ways in which you can reduce your exposure include:

In your own home:

Reduce mobile download and 4G usage wherever possible and do your internet work on a hardwired computer wherever practical.
Avoid mindless mobile surfing of the net to avoid boredom, every piece of data you don’t download reduces demand on cell towers and hopefully their increasing numbers.
Turn WiFi off when not in use, especially at night and hardwire your home completely where practical.
Replace cordless DECT phones in your home with a wired phone. Cordless phones are very deceiving and constantly emit a high level of radiation even when not in use.
Turn phones, ipads, laptops etc. onto airplane mode when not in use or when you are using a hardwire. They still try to continually establish transmission when not in use, in standby or when hardwired if not in airplane mode.
Remove or disable all apps and functions on your phone if not required and disable the mobile update functions. Turn off the Bluetooth, WiFi and mobile data functions when not in use as these continuously try to establish transmission when not in use in your pocket next to vital organs. Ideally turn onto airplane mode when in your pocket or a public place and especially at night.
Turn off any smart TVs and smart devises off at the wall when not in use. They still transmit microwaves trying to establish transmission to the WiFi or Bluetooth even when in standby mode and on most devices you cannot disable these functions.
Reduce or stop the use of games consoles and make sure they are completely off when not in use as they constantly emit RF radiation.
Do not use wireless baby monitors. These emit very aggressive microwaves signals right next to your infant.
Avoid wireless technology including speakers, headsets and wearables such as smart watches and fit bits. Smart watches emit a strong microwave signal directly into your main radial artery damaging blood cells as they circulate throughout your body.
Do not use Alexa’s and Echo’s or similar devises. These constantly emit RF radiation and encourage you to purchase even more wireless devices. Not only that, every word you speak in your home is no longer private.
Check all new electronic purchases carefully to ensure they are not ‘smart’ or contain an RF chip that cannot be disabled. If you cannot buy an alternative, do not buy it.
Refuse smart meters and do not be pressurised into getting one. If you have one already, take every measure to get this removed and changed to a safer analogue version. Do not accept a dumbed down version.
Under no circumstances buy a 5G enabled phone, device or car etc.

In the wider community:

Challenge your schools and workplaces use of WiFi and mobile technology showing them the evidence of harm.
Contact your council, government and industry to register your objections to the roll out of 5G as well as the proliferation of cell towers, smart meters, LED lampposts and wireless technology in public places, outside homes, parks and the natural environment etc. State that you DO NOT CONSENT to your forcible, unconsented and illegal exposure.
If you are in a council, government, industry, media or influential position, do not stand by and toe the party line and be complicit in this destruction of our/your health, the environment and every living creature at this critical time. Use your influence positively to make a stand and help make the change to reduce wireless and promote wired technology.

Despite what big wireless, big telecoms, the media and government are telling us, wireless technology is not safe to cellular and biological functions. Perhaps we could survive economically without 5G, smart meters, LED lamp posts with transmitters, driverless cars, all things wireless and the IoT’s after all. We did for millions of years. Our physical and mental health has never deteriorated at this rate since their introduction. Of course, there are other factors including pollution, GMO’s, poor food choices, pesticides etc. but the evidence of RF radiation harm is real and has rapidly covered the earth. Perhaps, rather than focusing on faster download speeds and connecting every devise to the Internet of Things so you can turn on your lights without getting up off the couch…saving our health and that of the next generation along with the insects, pollinators, birds and trees that support us might prove rather more beneficial to us all.

To make any changes millions of voices and careful individual purchasing changes are required. Do not assume someone else will take action.

In our next articles we will highlight some of the Liverpool and Wirral’s plans for 5G and hope you will join us in standing up against this untested, dangerous and unconsented exposure.

5G Or Not 5G?

WL - Post 5 Picture

The latest from our correspondent ‘Bright Spark’ and research undertaken on the planned 5G rollout across Merseyside and the UK. Again the information is posted for information and discussion.

Over the past few weeks we have brought your attention to the new LED lampposts which produce both a hormone disrupting blue/white LED light as well as house a 5G ready microwave transmitter under the guise of a lighting control system. We then focused on some of the health issues associated with existing wireless technology levels that we are already overexposed to (2G,3G,4G, wifi, smart meters and any number of wireless smart devices) and the inadequate ICNIRP guidelines which PHE, the council, government and industry quote and against which they have allowed the uncontrolled wireless industry to proliferate into our homes, schools, streets and public places.

This week we will bring the spotlight to 5G which is intended to power the insane internet of things (IoT’s). With the IoT’s, it is intended that almost every device (from cars to nappies) will connect together via the internet along with providing instant download speeds, drones, driverless cars, AI, robotics, facial recognition and any number of, as yet inconceivable, technologies, population monitoring and control devises. Oh sorry….it will benefit us all and is absolutely essential for the economy…with no harm whatsoever according to the government and industry!!!

ICNIRP/PHE and councils will say that there ‘is no evidence of harm’ from 5G technology. However, the wireless industry confesses ‘no studies show that 5G is safe’ (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/wireless-industry-confesses-no-studies-show-5g-safe?utm_source=Daily+Greenmedinfo.com+Email+List&utm_campaign=161b4c2495-5G&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_193c8492fb-161b4c2495-91570161&ct=t(5G)&mc_cid=161b4c2495&mc_eid=b4d6d6ef78). Brussels has just become the first major European city to halt 5G due to concerns about health effects (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/brussels-becomes-first-major-city-halt-5g-due-health-effects?utm_source=Daily+Greenmedinfo.com+Email+List&utm_campaign=161b4c2495-5G&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_193c8492fb-161b4c2495-91570161&ct=t(5G)&mc_cid=161b4c2495&mc_eid=b4d6d6ef78). And yet Liverpool and However the Liverpool City Region, including Wirral Council,  about to subject us all to this  technology, starting with Kensington in Liverpool and areas around Everton.

“Allowing this technology [5G] to be used without proving its safety is reckless in the extreme, as the millimeter waves are known to have a profound effect on all parts of the human body.” 
~ Prof. Trevor Marshall, Director Autoimmunity Research Foundation, California

Councils and utility companies working for Big Telecom and government are, right now, quietly in the process of installing powerful Fifth Generation (5G) cellular antenna on existing cell towers, utility poles, street lights, rooftops, traffic signals, under manholes etc. 5G, which is being sold as the economic saviour and panacea of download speeds that users cannot live without, will in fact take radiation exposure to a whole new and existentially dangerous level. This fact is conveniently not mentioned to the public, there has been no public consultation, and there is no mention in the mainstream media of the dangers of RF radiation as they clearly also stand to make huge profits from media platforms. Most people still remain blissfully unaware of what 5G even is and the very imminent plans across the Wirral and the UK that the Liverpool and Wirral Councils are supporting and allowing telecoms companies to roll out as they wish. Kensington in Liverpool is one of the first areas to be turned on with the area to be blanketed with 5G small cells and millimetre waves. It will be inescapable.

What you are not being told is that 5G is not just an upgrade to 4G. It will utilise both existing frequency bands along with much higher frequency millimetre wave bands. These high frequencies (up to 125 G Hz or more) have been recently auctioned off by the government at vast profits. (Wifi for e.g. is 2.4 GHz, with new wifi’s operating at 5GHz). These higher 5G ultra high frequency waves(up to 125 Ghz) are millimetre waves and are used in military weapons. Miraculously they are being positioned as safe on our streets.

The following article is one of many that clearly explains the exponential harm of the effects of the ‘phased array’ antenna used in 5G phones and small cells that will be inescapable:

https://emfacademy.com/5g-radiation/

As ultra high frequency 5G signals do not travel so far and are more easily blocked by obstacles, these small cells will be outside every 2-10 houses.  This will force involuntary exposure to wireless radiation 24/7 which cannot be turned off or avoided!

The impending 5G roll out is set to massively increase exposure to RF radiation by a factor of hundreds and full UK and world coverage is planned in the next few years.

What is 5G? 5G is a developing and growing complex collection of technologies including:-

Millimetre waves using new much higher (and even more dangerous) frequency spectrums than existing 3G and 4G.
Many thousands of new small cells everywhere as millimetre waves do not travel so far ensuring that they are located very close to homes
Massive MIMO. Each 5G base station will contain hundreds or thousands of antennas aiming multiple laser-like beams simultaneously at all cell phones and user devices in its service area. This technology is called “multiple input multiple output” or MIMO. FCC rules permit the effective radiated power of a 5G base station’s beams to be as much as hundreds of times more powerful than the levels permitted for current base stations.
Full duplex

The following gives a short explanation of the above.

Even more alarmingly, there are also plans to launch thousands of satellites into space to cover the entire globe with 5G, leaving no area of the world or it’s delicate electomagnetic atmosphere untouched.

ICNIRP insist there is ‘no evidence that it is not safe’ without providing any credible proof that it is safe biologically (oh sorry we forgot, as our last article explained….it doesn’t heat a fluid filled test dummy up by 2 degrees in 6 minutes….so of course it is perfectly safe!!!). This is because it is not safe and no credible non-industry sponsored scientific testing would be able to prove otherwise.

Some of frequencies used in 5G are known to interfere with cellular processes. 60 Ghz, for example, interferes with the oxygen molecule and others are used in new microwave weapons called active denial and growlers for crowd control.

Barry Trower, an ex UK navy weapons expert, explains many of the issues with wireless technology and 5G in these any many of his other videos:

The following article is an appeal signed by hundreds of scientists across the world appealing to governments to halt the roll out of 5G and explains the exponentially harmful effects of 5G on health, wildlife as well as the environment and atmosphere and is worth the time to review. THIS IS BEING IGNORED BY COUNCILS AND THE GOVERNMENT.

https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal

All life has adapted over time to live in the electromagnetic frequencies of the earths Schumann Resonance, somewhere between 7.83 and 8 Hz (i.e. 8 cycles per second). Researchers have shown that there is a key connection between the Schumann Resonance and the brain’s alpha states (frequencies between 8 Hz – 12 Hz). The Schumann Resonance is essentially the pulse of the heart of the earth, to which our hearts and brains are specifically attuned with. The Schumann Resonance is a geomagnetic electric resonance between the surface of the earth and the lower levels of the ionosphere, which has a natural ultra-low frequency signal. Without doubt it will be disrupted by 5G ground based infrastructure and satellites, and thus would disrupt the basic harmonic of all life on the planet. 

Each satellite will emit millimetre waves with an effective radiated power of up to 5 million watts from thousands of antennas arranged in a phased array. Although the energy reaching the ground from satellites will be less than that from ground-based antennas, it will irradiate areas of the Earth not reached by other transmitters and will be additional to ground-based 5G transmissions from billions of IoT objects. Even more importantly, the satellites will be located in the Earth’s magnetosphere, which exerts a significant influence over the electrical properties of the atmosphere including the Schumann Resonance. The alteration of Earth’s electromagnetic environment, especially where Schumann Resonance resides, may be an even greater threat to life than the radiation from ground-based antennas.

The following article is worth the time to read. It contains a lot of information on the Schumann Resonance and the potential catastrophic results of disrupting it along with a call to action to every citizen of the world not buy into 5G at a grass roots levels and actively hold those responsible to account.

http://treeoflifecenterus.com/5g-a-toxic-assault-on-the-planetary-web-of-life/

Dr Martin Pall explains the catastrophic dangers of 5G in this video lecture:

AGAINST THE ARGUMENT THAT 5G AND SMART METERS ARE ‘GREEN’ AND HELPING TO MONITOR AND PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT

Whilst there are many benefits quoted for monitoring the environment and being ‘green’, a few obvious flaws/omissions in this mainstream message include:-

Just from an energy and carbon emission perspective, the data centres alone required to power and store the internet and cloud etc. require massive amounts of power and housing in vast data centres. This does not include the energy required to power the countless billions of power hungry devices projected to connect to the Internet of Things.

Researchers say the data centre sector could be using 20% of all available electricity in the world by 2025 on the back of the large amounts of data being created at a fastest speed than ever before seen and the Internet of things.

https://data-economy.com/data-centres-world-will-consume-1-5-earths-power-2025/

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/11/tsunami-of-data-could-consume-fifth-global-electricity-by-2025

Wildlife is undoubtedly already affected by existing RF radiation frequencies and 5G will be catastrophic. There has already been a decline of c. 80% of insects alone in the last 20 years since the deployment of 2,3 and 4G cell towers. Birds, bees and pollinators are unable to navigate, their small bodies quickly affected and colonies collapse. An environmental and food chain collapse could be the next stage.

https://mdsafetech.org/environmental-and-wildlife-effects/

http://www.sccma-mcms.org/Portals/19/SilentSpringAticle_color_pr2.pdf?fbclid=IwAR37WtA2F7F6ogEHjprTXPZt4iridUOxiiobZ79pvwIq6RxWfUa_m8QPzXU

https://ehtrust.org/published-research-adverse-effect-wireless-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-bees/

Damaging effects of RF radiation on plants and trees are notable and researched

Plant and cell biology is affected in similar ways to humans and other biological creatures:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/search/advanced?qs=non-ionizing+radiation+effects+on+plants&origin=article&zone=qSearch

Conflict minerals include titanium, tin, tungsten and gold, which are used in many electronic components and computer products. The Internet of Things, aiming for every device to have an RF chip connecting to the internet, will only increase pressure on these precious recourses, many of which can only be found in a few locations across the world.

LED Street Lights are being rolled out across the country and other counties across the world on the basis of being a saviour for the environment by using energy saving LED’s and RF transmitting antenna to control them. We have covered the issues relating to LED lampposts and the transmitters in our earlier posts.

Smart Meters being pushed out into homes by government and utility companies also form part of the Internet of Things and the 5G infrastructure grid. These are sold as convenient and ‘energy saving’. There are many reports noting that no energy is saved and/or bills increase. Energy savings still depend on users actually ‘reducing’ usage which can be encouraged regardless of a smart meter display which may be rarely looked at. We covered the pulsed microwave dangers in last weeks post.

Tree Felling – the connection. It is acknowledged by the industry that trees block 5G signals. Trees are being felled across the Wirral, Liverpool, the country, the rail network and the globe at a furious and alarming pace on the pretence of H&S. Wirral and Liverpool Councils are progressing with fellings despite all public objections. Trees are being are felled to clear the way for the 5G signals to pass. Trees that are not felled are significantly harmed by the 5G signals.

http://media.withtank.com/cf9ae35027/waldmann-selsam_2016_scitotenv572p554-569_rf__trees.pdf

An academic UK university study linking to corporate studies below shows how trees affect 5G signals: page 5 acknowledges that the wireless signal is attenuated by trees and page 6 that the higher 5G frequencies are more affected by trees than 4G.

https://www.surrey.ac.uk/sites/default/files/White-Paper-Rural-5G-Vision_0.pdf

If the 20,000 satellites are deployed as planned, just the rocket fuel alone could unleash an environmental catastrophe with the ozone depletion and the release of black soot increasing global warning by several degrees. The satellite’s will also eventually fall and burn releasing dangerous substances across the globe.

https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/01/08/20000-satellites-for-5g-to-be-launched-sending-focused-beams-of-intense-microwave-radiation-over-entire-earth/?fbclid=IwAR03FTQcsgE0vHUvdJq6-bxZg5vXGDZS6v5TSFqMQdyGafgfi3u_S5oNs10

Conclusion: It may be hard to hear with our addiction to smartphones and ‘smart’ tech but existing 2G, 3G and 4G technology along with wifi and wirelesses technology is already having disastrous health and environmental impacts. It is also hard to hear that the government is supporting guidelines that DO NOT protect our health and have allowed things to get this far and are about to unleash much greater exposure on our health and the environment in the form of 5G.

‘Smart’ has been cleverly positioned from a marketing perspective. After all, would you really want to be the only one not to be ‘smart’ and/or to buy something if it were called a ‘microwave emitting, cancer causing spying’ devise? Get Smart….stop buying Smart!!!

Currently, one could at least try and take some measures to try and protect your family and limit exposure by moving further away from a cell tower (if you can still find anywhere) and by switching off your wifi and hardwiring, refusing smart meters, not buying smart tech with RF chips installed and limiting smart phone use to essential calls and texts rather than downloading videos and using every conceivable app. This is especially important around children. Although insects, birds, plants and wildlife do not have this luxury.

5G will be a much stronger and more damaging signal by a factor of c. x100 and will be a global, environmental and health catastrophe and will be inescapable.

This is a UK lecture on wireless, smart meters and 5G presenting a lot of information and evidence. It is over 2 hours long but would be worth watching if you have time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8kU3VXl-kg&t=504s
“5G rollout is absolutely insane”.
Dr. Martin Pall from the Washington State University (WSU)

Over the following weeks we will expose a little more about the Liverpool City Region plans that we have learned about for 5G (we are sure there is much more than we know). We will also look at ways that you can reduce your existing existing RF exposure…but the only way to not be exposed to 5G is to STOP IT. Get active, do your research, spread the information, stand up against the implementation to councils, utilities and telecoms, do not buy into this technology.

Wireless Wirral and the Planned 5G Rollout

 

image-6

The test dummy upon which the ICNIRP guidelines are based.

The latest in our debate generating series of posts brought to you by ‘Bright Spark’  :

Over the last two weeks we focused on the new LED lampposts and the unhealthy blue/white LED light and transmitters on top. These posts have hopefully got your attention and got you thinking about the prolific expansion of wireless technology in recent years and the impending ‘Internet of Things’ and the 5G testing in Liverpool and Birkenhead with the rest of the Wirral 5G enabled and ready to turn on. Whilst wireless technology is very convenient, it is very inconveniently unsafe, period.

There is no safe level of microwave radiation (Barry Trower).

Existing EMF (electromagnetic frequency) smog created by wireless technology (2G, 3G, 4G, 4G LTE, cell towers, wifi, smart meters, Bluetooth, cordless DECT phones, wireless sensors, baby monitors, Sky Q boxes, Echo, smartphones, tablets, laptops, smart TV’s, games consoles, all manner of smart tech and remote controlled devises, driver assisted cars etc.) and now 5G (which will lay the infrastructure to blanket every inch of the country and globe with millimetre waves c.100 times stronger than current levels for even faster download speeds, driverless cars, delivery drones, virtual reality, facial recognition, AI and other, as yet, inconceivable technologies) have already/are being rolled out in the Wirral, UK and across the world and positioned as safe, environmentally friendly and essential for every area of the economy.

When being sold the conveniences of wireless technology (instead of the more inconvenient and expensive hardwiring), or being sucked in by the lure of the promises of 5G to provide even faster download speeds and improve your life so you can download a video in 6 seconds instead of 7 minutes; have a driverless car, live in a virtual reality; sit on the couch whilst turning your lights and washing machine on and ordering your dinner to come by drone delivery; live in smart cities controlled by facial recognition and enjoy being connected to billions of other devises via the Internet of Things (IoT) and controlled by the cloud…you may want to look at the human and environmental health risks that have already occurred at current levels. In a future post we will focus on the exponential dangers of 5G which will use both existing microwave bands as well as new millimetre waves and utilises a different beam forming technology.

Is it worth your health and that of your children, grandchildren and the destruction of the environment to carry on accepting this as ‘progress’? We have all been complicit in inviting this technology into our homes and children’s lives and it is now down to each and every one of us now to reconsider our priorities.
The issue with government and industry guidelines and PHE/ICNIRP guidelines is this:-

The International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation (AGNIR), which Public Health England (PHE), government departments and industry steadfastly quote, maintain that there is no ‘convincing evidence’ or that ‘it does not appear’ that exposure to radio frequencies below ‘guidelines’ poses any risk.

These PHE/ICNIRP guidelines have not been updated since 1998 before wireless technology had been prolifically rolled out and are based SOLELY on ‘thermal’ (i.e. heating effects) over a short (c. 6 minute) exposure on a fluid filled test dummy (see above). They are based on the out-dated belief that only acute thermal effects are hazardous and that non-ionising radiation does not have enough power to affect DNA as ionising (nuclear) radiation does. They steadfastly maintain that there is no issue whatsoever with non-ionising radiation except a potential heating effect at high enough power densities (e.g. your microwave oven heats you up but your wifi is miraculously safe at a lower power, both of which operate on 2.4 GHz spectrum).

These guidelines DO NOT take any of the following into account:-

The non-thermal effects of RF radiation. These effects take place at levels way below recommended guidelines.
Any effects on actual cell biology, cell membranes, mitochondria and DNA etc.
The effects of multiple frequency exposure
The effects of ‘pulsed’ frequency exposure
The cumulative effect of 24/7 exposure
The addition of multiple RF emitting sources in one location
The effects on wildlife, trees, plants, birds, bees, pollinators, bacteria and viruses etc. on their biology and navigation etc.
The effects on infants, children, foetus and vulnerable groups

This link shows the fluid filled test dummy that has no biology upon which all so called ‘safety standards’ are based.
https://ehtrust.org/sar-test-inadequate/

The International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) exposure level is approx. 900 quadrillion times higher than natural background microwave radiation levels (0.000.000.000.010 µW/m²).

The current guidelines DO NOT PROVE that exposure to RF radiation is ‘safe’. They only state that there is no evidence to ‘suggest’ that it is not safe and are not considering the growing body of evidence and calls from scientists all around the world that demonstrate that it is most definitely not safe at levels way below these guidelines.

No ‘body’ is even measuring exposure levels or ‘combined’ exposure levels from cell towers, devises sold into homes and therefore combined in any location even against the glaringly inadequate guidelines. Big Telecoms and Big Wireless is rolling out unchecked and with impunity.

Damage from RF exposure is uninsurable. The Government, utility companies, big telecoms and smart tech industries may be turning a blind eye to the dangers of wireless radiation exposure but the insurance business has not. Lloyd’s of London sets the standard for the world and has a clause that excludes any compensation for claims: “directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electro-magnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.” Radio waves are explicitly included as they, specifically the microwave zone, are what enable wireless communications devices like cell phones, wi-fi, cordless phones etc. So RFs are invalidating insurance policies.
http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/lloyds-of-london-excludes-liability-coverage-for-harm-from-wireless-radiationrf-emf/

Whilst there are undoubtedly many benefits and conveniences of wireless technology, it is also clear that TRILLIONS OF £ & $ are at stake as well as geopolitical agendas that choose to ignore the dangers. The fact is there are thousands of research papers and calls from credible research scientists across the world that conclude that the current ‘safety standards’ are woefully inadequate and that the roll out of 5G will exacerbate the current issues exponentially. These are simply being ignored by industry/governments/councils and/or discredited by industry sponsored research.

A few examples that are being ignored:

On 31st May 2011, the World Health Organisation’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) categorised RF EMFs as a possible CARCINOGEN (Class 2b) – the same category as lead, DDT, chloroform & methylmercury. There are calls to upgrade this to a Group 1 (definitive) carcinogen.

Below is a recent commentary by Prof. Lennart Hardell on the findings of a $25mn US NTP study into cell phone signals.  His conclusion is unequivocal:

Based on the IARC preamble to the monographs, RF radiation should be classified as Group 1: The agent is carcinogenic to humans.
’This category is used when there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. Exceptionally, an agent may be placed in this category when evidence of carcinogenicity in humans is less than sufficient but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals and strong evidence in exposed humans that the agent acts through a relevant mechanism of carcinogenicity.’ (http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Preamble/currentb6evalrationale0706.php)

Hardell’s work led to the category of 2B back in 2011, he now is calling for it to be upgraded to Class 1.

https://ehtrust.org/cancer-expert-declares-cell-phone-wireless-radiation-carcinogenic-humans/
On 6th May 2011, the Council of Europe issued a report titled “Potential dangers of EMFs and their effect on the environment” in which they called for an IMMEDIATE reduction in exposure to EMFs by children. The Council advocates a precautionary principle be applied to wireless emissions to prevent public health disaster akin to “tobacco, leaded petrol and asbestos”.

See the Bioinitiative Report 2012. This is informative and gives a clear statement of the problem and a lot references http://www.bioinitiative.org.

Martin Pall, PhD (Caltech, 1968) Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences Washington State University. Below are some links to his extensive research and letter to California legislators:

https://peaceinspace.blogs.com/files/5g-emf-hazards–dr-martin-l.-pall–eu-emf2018-6-11us3.pdf

https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Pall-Letter-to-CalLegis-FINAL-8-7-17.pdf

Other references throughout this note contain many credible and peer reviewed studies of evidence of harm that are being ignore/dismissed in favour of government/industry objectives.

Health Effects of RF Radiation and Biological Mechanisms:-

Symptoms of RF (radiofrequency) radiation exposure are many and many of these conditions have increased exponentially in the last 10-20 years since the advent of wireless technology, cell towers, wifi and EMF exposure etc. One has to wonder why there is no other viable explanation that has been shown for these huge increases in conditions that co-inside with this timeline. Doctors are not recognising (or not allowed to recognise the connection).

Some of these health effects include:-

Sleep problems, fatigue, learning and concentration problems, stress, anxiety, depression, headaches, tinnitus, heart problems, palpitations, arrhythmias, cramps, nausea, nosebleeds, hormone disruption, fertility problems, ADHD, autism and neurological and sensory spectrum disorders, immune system disorders, respiratory problems, diabetes, skin rashes and flushes, dementia, alzheimers and cancer. These are known radiation sicknesses.

https://www.radiationhealthrisks.com/21-health-symptoms-rf-radiation/

https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/library/downloads/pf-emfs-9-heart-dementia-2018-11.pdf

There is also alot of information and references on the dangers of wireless radiation on the following links:-

https://ehtrust.org.
https://ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/

Basic biology is clear in that every cell and nerve in the body operates using minute electrical signals. There can be no doubt that these biological signals will be affected by exposure to unnatural and continuous high frequency microwave radiation at billions of cycles per second.

Wifi, for example, operates at 2.4 Ghz (2.4 billion cycles per second) and so too does your microwave oven! Although the power density is less, how does a microwave oven on a stick in your home suddenly become safe? In short, it does not. It might not heat you up by 2 degrees in 6 minutes but any logic would tell you this is not safe 24/7.

5G is set to use various higher military grade millimetre wave frequencies e.g. 60Ghz (60 billion cycles per second) and 125 Ghz (125 billion cycles per second) which have been auctioned off already at huge profit to governments all over the world. High-frequency 60GHz 5G has already been shown to interfere with the oxygen molecules we breathe amongst many other serious metabolic issues.

The actual biological mechanisms by which these illnesses manifest are many and complex and too many to note in details this paper but research includes:-

Changes in DNA and mitochondria, changes in cellular process, damage to voltage gated ion channels leading to electrical signal changes in the cell, changes in brain waves and neuron responses, oxidative stress, cell inflammation and damage to the blood/brain permeability.

https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/library/downloads/pf-emfs-4-cells-mechanisms-2018-11.pdf

https://ehtrust.org/science/recent-scientific-publications-by-the-eht-scientific-team/

Dr Martin Palls work, papers and lectures explain clearly the mechanisms of harm as well as how children, insects and trees are particularly affected. His predictions are dire and should urgently be heeded but are ignored by government and industry:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsaB7ewFsN0&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR2zSxxJflxoT-9IReJKGnVJSHCTbvTB-ilb3dZLKI0II67TMbRm4vdxCCg
https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Pall-Letter-to-CalLegis-FINAL-8-7-17.pdf

Contrary to ICNIRP, PHE and Government guidelines, it is quite evident that there is considerable scientific doubt of the safety of these EU, UK guidelines and standards.

Anecdotally, many people are becoming sick with many conditions noted above but with ‘unknown cause’ and for others, lives have become a misery with Electro Sensitivity. It is estimated that Elecro Sensitivity will increase from the current estimate of 3-10% to 50% in the coming years. Peoples health and the environment is being damaged whether they are ‘electrically sensitive’ and aware of it or not.

http://www.es-uk.info/

These connections are simply dismissed by government and NHS doctors. Living close to unavoidable sources and being forcibly exposed to RF radiation is a real misery for many people. Many people are acutely aware of the cause of their illness or discomfort, often living close to a cell tower or becoming sensitive after being exposed to Wifi all day in work, school or home or recently having a smart meter installed and others remain unaware of the cause getting medical treatments that will not help.

A recent article in the Lancet outlines concerns of harm from conception that has now occurred and increased rapidly in the past 20 years. Amongst other issues, it outlines evidence of the effects of exposure to wireless devices on the CNS, including altered neurodevelopment, increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases, behavioural disorders and structural and functional changes in the brain associated with ADHD-like behaviour in children.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext?dgcid=raven_jbs_etoc_email&fbclid=IwAR1s3PagJHpPbQjkb2jhRvCGrdJwL877rIXQQRr70GdaSIBmCquPBi7QaH0

At a time when environmental health scientists tackle serious global issues such as climate change and chemical toxicants in public health, it calls for an urgent need to address so-called electrosmog.

The current guidelines are simply irrelevant to continuous exposure:

http://www.es-uk.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/03.4-Importance-of-Biological-not-Heating-Guidelines.pdf

Please refer to the Bioinitiative report and the Building Biology Levels precautionary guidelines for RF/Microwave exposure which take non thermal effects into account:

http://www.bioinitiative.org
http://www.slt.co/Downloads/Education/EMF-Exposure-Guidelines-For-Sleeping-Areas.pdf
http://www.emfwise.com/emf-safety-standards.php
http://www.emfwise.com/tableofeffects.php

The conversion and the various measuring units are very complex and it is easy to understand how invested interests can persuade government and decision makers into believing inadequate safety measures.

In summary, however, by comparison, the EU standard being used to determine ‘safety’ is thousands of times higher than the levels shown to cause cellular damage and health issues and the precautionary levels advised by building biology guidelines. In nature, levels are almost undetectable which is a clear measure of the real level at which biology operates at a healthy level:-

EU Safety Standard: 1 mW/cm2 (= 61.4 V/m)

Nature: <0.00002 V/m

Building Biology No Concern: < 0.006 V/m
Building Biology Slight Concern: 0.006-0.06 V/m
Building Biology Severe Concern: 0.06-0.6 V/m
Building Biology Extreme Concern: >0.6 V/m

To reiterate, the ‘EU/UK safety standards’ are thousands of times higher than biological safety standards and only measure SAR (thermal) effects performed on a fluid filled dummy. They do not take ANY account of non thermal effects, continuous exposure, pulsed frequency exposure, multiple frequency range exposure etc. to the actual biology of any creature large or small. No one is measuring the combined exposure effect in an average home e.g living next to a cell tower, 3 smart meters, wifi, plus neighbours smart meters and wifi, combined with the vast array of wireless devises. No one is measuring effects on wildlife, plant health and the decline of insects, pollinators and birds. Insect populations have plummeted dramatically in the last 10 years and this correlates with the introduction of 3 and 4G, smart meters and smart LED lamp posts.

There are simply thousands of peer reviewed studies linking RF radiation exposure to cancer and many of the illnesses above and yet these studies, along with the classification of the WHO are being ignored. The government/industry is rolling out ever increasing wireless infrastructure including masts for full UK 4GLTE coverage and is now laying the foundations for the 5G infrastructure and smart cities (including allowing existing masts to be upgraded to 5G, new 5G upgradable masts, LED lampposts with RF transmitters, and any number of street furniture such as manholes and telephone boxes as well as (the insane) space satellites planned to augment the coverage). Industry, with an eye on ‘the internet of things’ is selling every conceivable devise loaded with RF transmitters, that in most cases cannot be disabled, to the unsuspecting and technology enraptured public.

There is so much evidence of harm that is being ignored in favour of the industry/government interests. It is an extremely inconvenient truth that this technology is not safe and action must be taken to STOP THE ROLL OUT OF 5G and limit the use of existing wireless technology.
Most of the public are unaware of the dangers as they are not being informed of these dangers by the mainstream media or may simply not believe that the government would knowingly allow this to happen (refer tobacco, diesel, asbestos, GMO’s, fracking, pesticides etc!). This is a global experiment without informed consent. RF radiation cannot be seen, heard or perceived. Those that are aware and/or sensitive are horrified at the complicity of the government and councils in allowing this crime against humanity.

It should be the duty of the council and the government to act in the best interests of the environment and the health of the public and this is currently not the case. The future liability for complicity in the irreversible harm to human health and the environment must surely rest with the council, government and government advisory bodies as well as industry with whom they work hand in hand. They need to immediately acknowledge the scientific evidence and amend the government policies proliferating the infrastructure roll out and industry sales of RF devices. Unfortunately, this does not look like it will happen any time soon and may already be too late for the health of many.

To make any changes millions of voices and careful individual purchasing changes are required. Do not assume someone else will take action.